Neoglycorandomization and digitoxin analogs

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides methods of producing libraries of compounds with enhanced desirable properties and diminished side effects as well as the compounds produced by the methods. In preferred embodiments, methods of the present invention use a universal chemical glycosylation method that employs reducing sugars and requires no protection or activation. In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a library of neoglycoside digitoxin analogs that includes compounds with significantly enhanced cytotoxic potency toward human cancer cells and tumor-specificity, but are less potent Na + /K + -ATPase inhibitors in a human cell line than digitoxin.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 11/166,881 filed on Jun. 24, 2005, which claims benefit of U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 60/521,721 filed on Jun. 24, 2004,both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 60/957,623 filed on Aug. 23, 2007, which is incorporatedby reference herein in its entirety.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

Not applicable.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to glycosylated secondarymetabolites. Specifically, the present invention relates to methods,techniques and uses of neoglycorandomization, especially as applied todigitoxin, indolocarbazole and anthracyline analogs.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The natural product pool, which contains many glycosylated secondarymetabolites, is the source of over half the world's drug leads.Carbohydrate appendages often play a key role in drug-targetinteractions. Therefore, alteration of glycosylation patterns onsecondary metabolites is a potential strategy for the generation ofnovel therapeutics.

Carbohydrates mediate many essential biological processes. For example,the saccharide-containing macromolecules that decorate cell surfaces arevital to a variety of cellular functions including cell-cellrecognition, apoptosis, differentiation, and tumor metastasis. In asimilar fashion, glycosylated natural products contain sugar attachmentsessential for their activity and continue to serve as reliable platformsfor the development of many of existing front-line drugs (Clardy, J. etal., Nature (2004) 432, 829-837; Thorson, J. S. et al., Curr. Org. Chem.(2001) 5, 139-150). While the diverse chemical space accessible bycarbohydrates contributes to a remarkably vast array of biologicalfunction (Dobson, C. M. Nature (2004) 432, 824-865), a preciseunderstanding of the relationship between sugars and biological activityremains limited by the availability of convenient and effectiveglycosylation tools (Langenhan, J. M. et al., Curr. Org. Synth. (2005)2, 59-8).

Digitoxin (1) is a glycosylated natural product with numerous actionsand therapeutic uses. In addition to its well-known cardiac activity,which is mediated by inhibition of the plasma membrane Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase(Paula, S. et al., Biochemistry (2005) 44, 498-510), digitoxin hasdemonstrated in vitro anti-cancer properties (Johansson, S. et al.,Anti-Cancer Drugs (2001) 12, 475-483) and patient profiling suggests thesurvival rate of cancer patients taking digitoxin is statisticallyenhanced (Stenkvist, B. Anti-Cancer Drugs (2001) 12, 635-636; Haux, J.et al., BMC Cancer (2001) 1, 11). Cardiac glycosides were also recentlynoted to inhibit the expression of four genes that are overexpressed inprostate cancer cells, including transcription factors and the apoptosisinhibitor survivin (Johnson, P. H. et al., Molecular Cancer Therapeutics(2002) 1, 1293-1304), and to provide protective effects againstpolyglutamine-based diseases (Piccioni, F. et al., Hum. Mol. Genet.(2004) 13, 437-446). Digitoxin also inhibits activation of the NF-κBsignaling pathway in cystic fibrosis (CF) cells, suppressinghypersecretion of IL-8, a protein implicated in lung inflammation, fromCF lung epithelial cells (Srivastava, M. et. al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.(2004) 101, 7693-7698). Given that the attached sugars are implicated asmediators of the unique spectrum of biological properties exhibited bycardiac glycosides (Rathore, H. et al., J. Med. Chem. (1986) 29,1945-1952), digitoxin provides an excellent model to examine the generalutility of neoglycosylation to efficiently construct a glycorandomizedlibrary and to directly assess the biological impact of varying thesugars attached to a given natural product-based drug.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides methods of producing libraries ofcompounds with enhanced desirable properties and diminished side effectsas well as the libraries and compounds produced by the methods. Inpreferred embodiments, methods of the present invention use a universalchemical glycosylation method that employs reducing sugars and requiresno protection or activation. In a preferred embodiment, the inventionprovides a library of neoglycoside digitoxin analogs that includescompounds with significantly enhanced cytotoxic potency toward humancancer cells and tumor-specificity, but are less potent Na⁺/K⁺-ATPaseinhibitors in a human cell line than digitoxin.

In general, the present invention provides neoglycosides produced by thereaction of an aglycon having a secondary alkoxyamine and a reducingsugar selected from the group consisting of L-sugars, D-sugars,deoxy-sugars, dideoxy-sugars, glucose epimers, substituted sugars,uronic acids and oligosaccharides. Suitable aglycons include digitoxinanalogs, non-digoxigenin steroids, including dihydroxytestosteronederivatives, indolocarbazoles, anthracylines, macrolides, peptides,including ribosomal peptides as well as non-ribosomal peptides such asvancomycin, and alkaloids, such as colchicine and 3-alkylpyridinealkaloids. Suitable reducing sugars include L-ribose, D-ribose,L-fucose, D-fucose, 2-deoxy-D-galactose, 3-deoxy-D-glucose,6-deoxy-D-glucose, 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose,6-deoxy-6-fluoro-D-glucose, L-lyxose, D-lyxose, L-rhamnose, L-allose,D-allose, L-altrose, D-altrose, L-galactose, D-galactose, L-xylose,D-xylose, D-gulose, L-mannose, D-mannose, L-idose, D-idose, L-mycarose,6-keto-D-galactose, L-arabinose, D-arabinose,N-acetyl-D-galactosaminose, melibiose, lactose, maltose,D-galacturonose, L-talose, D-talose, 6-deoxy-6-azo-D-mannose, L-glucose,D-glucose, O-D-glucose, R—C(3)aglycon, S—C(3) aglycon.

In another embodiment, the present invention comprises neoglycosidesproduced by the reaction of an aglycon having a secondary alkoxyamineand a reducing sugar from the group consisting of L-riboside,D-riboside, L-fucoside, D-fucoside, 2-deoxy-D-galactoside,3-deoxy-D-glucoside, 6-deoxy-D-glucoside, 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucoside,6-deoxy-6-fluoro-D-glucoside, L-lyxoside, D-lyxoside, L-rhamnoside,L-alloside, D-alloside, L-altroside, b-altroside, L-galactoside,D-galactoside, L-xyloside, D-xyloside, D-guloside, L-mannoside,D-mannoside, L-idoside, D-idoside, L-mycaroside, 6-keto-D-galactoside,L-arabinoside, D-arabinoside, N-acetyl-D-galactosaminoside, melibioside,lactoside, maltoside, D-galacturonoside, L-taloside, D-taloside,6-deoxy-6-azido-D-mannoside, L-glucoside, D-glucoside, O-D-glucoside,R—C(3)aglycon and S—C(3) aglycon.

In preferred embodiments, the invention provides neoglycosides of theformula:

In one preferred embodiment, the invention provides a library ofneoglycosides comprising a plurality of neoglycosides selected from thegroup consisting of L-riboside (5β), D-riboside (6β), L-fucoside (7β),D-fucoside (8β), 2-deoxy-D-galactoside (9β), 3-deoxy-D-glucoside (10β),6-deoxy-D-glucoside (11β), 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucoside (12β),6-deoxy-6-fluoro-D-glucoside (13β), L-lyxoside (14β), D-lyxoside (15β),L-rhamnoside (16β), L-alloside (17β), D-alloside (18β), L-altroside(19β), D-altroside (20β), L-galactoside (21β), D-galactoside (22β),L-xyloside (23β), D-xyloside (24β), D-guloside (25β), L-mannoside (26β),D-mannoside (27β), L-idoside (28β), D-idoside (29β), L-mycaroside (30β),6-keto-D-galactoside (31β), L-arabinoside (32β), D-arabinoside (33β),N-acetyl-D-galactosaminoside (34β), melibioside (35β), lactoside (36β),maltoside (37β), D-galacturonoside (38β), L-taloside (39β), D-taloside(40β), 6-deoxy-6-azido-D-mannoside (41β), L-glucoside (42β), D-glucoside(4β), O-D-glucoside (43β), R—C(3)aglycon (3β), S—C(3) aglycon (3α),L-riboside (5α), D-riboside (6α), L-fucoside (7α), D-fucoside (8α),2-deoxy-D-galactoside (9α), 3-deoxy-D-glucoside (10α),6-deoxy-D-glucoside (11α), 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucoside (12α),6-deoxy-6-fluoro-D-glucoside (13α), L-lyxoside (14α), D-lyxoside (15α),L-rhamnoside (16α), L-alloside (17α), D-alloside (18α), L-altroside(19α), D-altroside (20α), L-galactoside (21α), D-galactoside (22α),L-xyloside (23α), D-xyloside (24α), D-guloside (25α), L-mannoside (26α),D-mannoside (27α), L-idoside (28α), D-idoside (29α), L-mycaroside (30α),6-keto-D-galactoside (31α), L-arabinoside (32α), D-arabinoside (33α),N-acetyl-D-galactosaminoside (34α), melibioside (35α), lactoside (36α),maltoside (37α), D-galacturonoside (38α), L-taloside (39α), D-taloside(40α), 6-deoxy-6-azido-D-mannoside (41α), L-glucoside (42α) andD-glucoside (4α).

In one embodiment, the invention comprises a library comprising aplurality of neoglycosides produced by the reaction of an aglycon havinga secondary alkoxyamine and at least one reducing sugar selected fromthe group consisting of L-sugars, D-sugars, deoxy-sugars,dideoxy-sugars, glucose epimers, substituted sugars andoligosaccharides. In another embodiment, the invention comprises acollection comprising at least two compounds produced by the reaction ofan aglycon having a secondary alkoxyamine and a reducing sugar from thegroup consisting of L-ribose, D-ribose, L-fucose, D-fucose,2-deoxy-D-galactose, 3-deoxy-D-glucose, 6-deoxy-D-glucose,2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose, 6-deoxy-6-fluoro-D-glucose, L-lyxose,D-lyxose, L-rhamnose, L-allose, D-allose, L-altrose, D-altrose,L-galactose, D-galactose, L-xylose, D-xylose, D-gulose, L-mannose,D-mannose, L-idose, D-idose, L-mycarose, 6-keto-D-galactose,L-arabinose, D-arabinose, N-acetyl-D-galactosaminose, melibiose,lactose, maltose, D-galacturonose, L-talose, D-talose,6-deoxy-6-azo-D-mannose, L-glucose, D-glucose, O-D-glucose,R—C(3)aglycon, S—C(3) aglycon.

In some embodiments, the aglycon having a secondary alkoxyamine isselected from digitoxin analogs, non-digoxigenin steroids, includingdihydroxytestosterone derivatives, indolocarbazoles, anthracylines,macrolides, peptides, and alkaloids, including 3-alkylpyridinealkaloids. In preferred embodiments, the aglycon having a secondaryalkoxyamine is selected from the group consisting of 3α, 3β and mixturesthereof.

In certain embodiments, the present invention provides a method ofmaking a library comprising a plurality of neoglycosides comprising thesteps of providing at least two reducing sugars of the formula:

where R₁, R₂, R₃, and R₄ are independently selected from —H, —OH, —N₃,—NH₂, —CH₃, —CH₂OH, —CN₃, —CH₂NH, —CH₂SH, —CNH₂, —CH₂N₃, —COOH, —COCH₃,—CXH₂, —CX₂H, and where X is Cl, Br, F, or I; and contacting thereducing sugars with at least one aglycon having a secondary alkoxyamineto form a neoglycoside. In preferred embodiments, the aglycon having asecondary alkoxyamine is a digitoxin methoxyamine. In some embodiments,the aglycon having a secondary alkoxyamine is selected from digitoxinanalogs, non-digoxigenin steroids, including dihydroxytestosteronederivatives, indolocarbazoles, anthracylines, macrolides, peptides, andalkaloids, including 3-alkylpyridine alkaloids. In certain embodiments,the step of contacting is performed at a temperature from about 40 toabout 60 degrees Celsius. In certain embodiments, the step of contactingis performed in the presence of a 3:1 mixture of DMF and AcOH.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides a pharmaceuticalcomposition of a neoglycoside of the present invention, apharmaceutically acceptable ester, salt or prodrug thereof combined witha pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In a further embodiment, thepresent invention provides a method of treating a subject having cancercells comprising the step of contacting the cancer cells with aneffective amount of the neoglyoside of the present invention, orpharmaceutically acceptable ester, salt or prodrug thereof. Preferredneoglycosides include L-riboside (5β), D-lyxoside (15β), L-xyloside(23β), D-mannoside (27β), D-arabinoside (33β), D-taloside (40β) and amixture thereof. Also provided is the use of a neoglycoside of thepresent invention for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatmentof cancer.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides a neoglycosidehaving the structure:

where R is —CH₃, —CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)₂, allyl, benzyl, —CH₂CH₂CH₃,—CH(CH₃)CH₂CH₃, cyclopentyl or cyclohexyl; and the sugar is L-ribose orL-xylose.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides neoglycosideshaving the structure:

where R₁, R₂, R₃, and R₄ of the sugar are independently selected from—H, —OH, —N₃, —NH₂, —CH₃, —CH₂OH, —CN₃, —CH₂NH, —CH₂SH, —CNH₂, —CH₂N₃,—COOH, —COCH₃, —CXH₂, or —CX₂H, where X is Cl, Br, F, or 1; where R₅ is—CH₃, —CH₂CH₃, —C(CH₃)₃, —CH(CH₃)₂, allyl or benzyl; and where theaglycon is a digitoxin analog, a non-digoxigenin steroid, including adihydroxytestosterone derivative, an indolocarbazole, an anthracyline, amacrolide, a peptide, or an alkaloid, including a 3-alkylpyridinealkaloid. In one aspect of the present invention, a neoglycoside librarycomprising at least two different neoglycosides is provided.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides an amphemedosideglycoside. Amphimedisides provided by this embodiment include withoutlimitation amphimedoside A, amphimedoside B, amphimedoside C,amphimedoside D, and amphimedoside E.

In a further embodiment, the present invention provides a method forproviding a neoglycoside comprising reacting: (i) an aglycon selectedfrom a digitoxin analog, a non-digoxigenin steroid, including adihydroxytestosterone derivative, an indolocarbazole, an anthracyline, amacrolide, a peptide, and an alkaloid, including a 3-alkylpyridinealkaloid, wherein said aglycon bears a secondary oxyamine; and (ii) areducing sugar selected from a L-sugar, a D-sugar, a deoxy-sugar, adideoxy-sugar, a glucose epimer, a substituted sugar, a uronic acid, oran oligosaccharide to thereby provide a neoglycoside. The reducing sugaris preferably selected from the group consisting of L-ribose, D-ribose,L-fucose, D-fucose, 2-deoxy-D-galactose, 3-deoxy-D-glucose,6-deoxy-D-glucose, 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose,6-deoxy-6-fluoro-D-glucose, L-xylose, D-xylose, L-rhamnose, L-allose,D-allose, L-altrose, D-altrose, L-galactose, D-galactose, L-xylose,D-xylose, D-gulose, L-mannose, D-mannose, L-idose, D-idose, L-mycarose,6-keto-D-galactose, L-arabinose, D-arabinose,N-acetyl-D-galactosaminose, melibiose, lactose, maltose,D-galacturonose, L-talose, D-talose, 6-deoxy-6-azo-D-mannose, L-glucose,D-glucose, O-D-glucose, R—C(3)aglycon, S—C(3) aglycon and mixturesthereof. Further, the aglycon preferably has a structure according to:

where R is —CH₃, —CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)₂, allyl, benzyl, —CH₂CH₂CH₃,—CH(CH₃)CH₂CH₃, cyclopentyl or cyclohexyl.

The invention also provides a method of making a neoglycoside librarycomprising providing a plurality of reducing sugars selected from thegroup consisting of a L-sugar, a D-sugar, a deoxy-sugar, adideoxy-sugar, a glucose epimer, a substituted sugar, a uronic acid, anoligosaccharide and mixtures thereof; and contacting the reducing sugarswith at least one aglycon having a secondary oxyamine to form aplurality of neoglycosides. In a preferred embodiment, the aglycon is adigitoxin analog, a non-digoxigenin steroid, an indolocarbazole, ananthracyline, a macrolide, a peptide or, an alkaloid, including a3-alkylpyridine alkaloid, and the reducing sugar is of the formula:

where R₁, R₂, R₃, and R₄ are independently selected from —H, —OH, —N₃,—NH₂, —CH₃, —CH₂OH, —CN₃, —CH₂NH, —CH₂SH, —CNH₂, —CH₂N₃, —COOH, —COCH₃,—CXH₂, —CX₂H, and where X is Cl, Br, F, or I. Further, the aglycon ispreferably of the formula

where R is —CH₃, —CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)₂, —C(CH₃)₃, allyl, benzyl,—CH₂CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)CH₂CH₃, cyclopentyl or cyclohexyl.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a schematic illustration of the method ofneoglycorandomization of the present invention that involves thechemoselective formation of glycosidic bonds between reducing sugars anda secondary alkoxyamine to form a library of neoglycosides compared tochemoenzymatic glycorandomization. Neoglycorandomization (“path A”) isonly limited by the ease of installation of the reactive secondaryalkoxyamine group onto a complex natural product aglycon. In contrast,chemoenzymatic glycorandomization (“path B”) uses nucleotide sugaractivation enzymes (“E₁” and “E₂”) and glycosyltransferase enzymes(“GlyT”) that display natural or engineered promiscuity to glycosylatesecondary metabolites, and is thus limited to natural products for whichpromiscuous glycosylation machinery is available. FIG. 1B is a schematicillustration showing that secondary alkoxyamines react to formclosed-ring neoglycosides while primary alkoxyamines react with reducingsugars to form open-chain oximes.

FIG. 2A is a schematic illustration showing that aglycons having asecondary alkoxyamine, 3β and its C(3) epimer 3α, were generated inthree simple steps from the parent natural product digitoxin. FIG. 2B isa schematic illustration showing the reaction of aglycons 3β and 3α withD-glucose (2 equiv.) in 3:1 DMF/acetic acid at 60° C. to formneoglycosides 4β and 4α respectively, in >70% yield by ¹H NMR.

FIG. 3A is a schematic illustration of the solid state structure of 4βshown with 50% thermal probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms areomitted for clarity. FIG. 3B is a schematic illustration of the solidstate structure of 4β (red) superimposed on the solid state structure ofa homologous O-glucoside, actodigin. FIG. 3C is a Newman projectionalong the C(2)-C(3)-N(3)-C(1′) torsion of neoglycoside 4β and thecorresponding torsion of 23 known cardiac glycosides showing that theneoglycoside torsion falls within the range of torsions displayed in thesolid state by the known cardiac glycosides. FIG. 3D is a Newmanprojection along the C(3)-N(3)-C(1′)—C(2′) torsion of 4β and thecorresponding torsions of 23 known cardiac glycosides reveals that theneoglycoside torsion falls on the periphery of the narrow range oforientations displayed by natural O-glycosides. The crystallographicinformation displayed came from the following sources: actogenin(Fullerton, D. S. et al., Mol. Pharmacol. (1980) 17, 43), oleandrin(Kartha, G. et al., Cryst. Struct. Commun. (1981) 10, 1323), digoxigeninmonodigitoxoside monohydrate (Go, K. et al., Cryst. Struct. Commun.(1982) 11, 279), digoxigenin bis(digitoxoside) (Go, K. et al., Cryst.Struct. Commun. (1982) 11, 285), digoxigenin bis(digitoxoside)tetrahydrate (Go, K. et al., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci.(1989) 45, 306),(3β,5β,14β,20E)-methyl-3-((2,6-dideoxy-β-ribohexopyranosyl)oxy)-14-hydroxypregn-20-ene-21-carboxylate(S7),(3β,5β,14β,20E)-methyl-3-((2,6-dideoxy-3,4-O-(1-methylethylidene)-13-D-ribo-hexopyranosyl)oxy)-14-hydroxypregn-20-ene-21-carboxylate(Kihara, M. et al., Tetrahedron (1984) 40, 1121),(3β,5β,14β)-methyl-3-((2,6-dideoxy-3,4-O-(1-methylethylidene)-α-ribo-hexopyranosyl)oxy)-14-hydroxy-21-methylene-(pregane-21-carboxylate)(Kihara, M., et al. (1984)),(20S)-20,22-dihydrodigitoxigenin-3-(2,6-dideoxy-3,4-O-(1-methylethylidene)-β-D-ribo-hexopyranoside)(Kihara, M. et al., (1984)), digoxin (Go, K. et al., Cryst. Struct.Commun. (1979) 8, 149; Go, K et al., J. P. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B:Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. (1980) 36, 1811), gitoxigeninbisdigitoxoside ethyl acetate solvate (Go, K. et al., Acta Crystallogr.,Sect. B: Struct. Sci. (1989) 45, 306), gitoxin (Go, K. et al., ActaCrystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. (1980) 36,3034.), cerleaside-A monohydrate (Go, K. et al., Acta Crystallogr.,Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. (1980) 36, 3034),digitoxigenin bisdigitoxoside ethyl acetate solvate (Go, K. et al., ActaCrystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. (1989) 45, 306), ouabain octahydrate(Messerschmidt, A. Cryst. Struct. Commun. (1980) 9, 1185),14β-hydroxy-3β-O-(L-thevetosyl)-5β-card-20(22)-enolide chloroformsolvate (Fun, H.-K. et al.,. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E: Struct. Rep.Online (2003) 59, o1694),(3β,5β,14β)-3-((2′,6′-dideoxy-3′,4′-O-(1′-methylethylidene)-β-D-ribo-hexopyranosyl)oxy)-14-hydroxycard-20(22)-enolide(Kihara, M. et al., (1984)),(3β,5β,14β)-3-((2′,6′-dideoxy-3′,4′-O-(1′-methylethylidene)-β-D-ribo-hexopyranosyl)oxy)-14-hydroxycard-20(22)-enolide(Rohrer, D. C. et al., (1984), 106, 8269), digitoxigenin bisdigitoxosideethyl acetate hydrate (Go, K. et al., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B:Struct. Sci. (1989) 45, 306),3β-O-(2′,3′-O-isopropylidene-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-digitoxigenin(Pfeiffer, D. et al., J. Cryst. Res. and Technol. (1986) 21, 223),14β-hydroxy-3β-O-(L-thevetosyl)-5β-card-20(22)-enolide methanol solvatehemihydrate (Chantrapromma, S. et al., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C:Cryst. Struct. Commun. (2003) 59, o68),3β-O-(L-2′-O-acetylhevetosyl)-14β-hydroxy-5β-card-20(22)-enolide(Chantrapromma, S. et al., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct.Commun. (2003), 59, o68.).

FIG. 4 is a graphic representation of the results of studies on thehydrolytic stability of neoglycoside 4α. The chemical stability of theneoglycosidic linkage was examined by monitoring the hydrolyticdegradation of neoglycoside 4α in a 3 mM solution of 1:1 DMSO/buffer.Three buffers were used, 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5), 50 mM phosphatebuffer (pH 7), and 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 9). Neoglycoside degradationwas monitored by reverse phase HPLC on an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8column (4.6×150 mm) with a flow rate of 0.8 mL min⁻¹ and a lineargradient of 49% CH₃OH/H₂O to 89% CH₃OH/H₂O over 20 min. At t=0,neoglycoside 4α in 500 μL DMSO was added to 500 μL buffer, and theresulting solution was vortexed for 40 sec, then immediately injectedonto the HPLC. Peak areas at 220 nm were used to estimate theneoglycoside/aglycon ratio, which is reported as “percent neoglycosideremaining” [Aneoglycoside/(Aneoglycoside+Aaglycon)] for each of thethree buffer systems.

FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B are graphical representation of the results of ahigh-throughput assays of the cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines ofmembers of a neoglycoside library of one embodiment of the presentinvention. In the assay, live cells were distinguished by the presenceof a ubiquitous intracellular enzymatic activity which converts thenon-fluorescent cell-permeable molecule calcein AM to the intenselyfluorescent molecule calcein, which is retained within live cells. TheIC₅₀ value for each library member represents at least six replicates ofdose-response experiments conducted over five concentrations usingtwo-fold dilutions. For the entire panel of 81 compounds in 10 celllines, the average error was 17%. IC₅₀ Reciprocal IC₅₀ values as afunction of library member and cell line. Standard errors are depictedwith error bars. Numerical values and corresponding error values can befound in Table 4. Du145: human colon carcinoma; MCF₇: human breastcarcinoma; HCT-116: human colon carcinoma, Hep3B: human liver carcinoma;SF-268: human CNS glioblastoma; SK-OV-3: human ovary adenocarcinoma;NCI-H460: human lung carcinoma; A549: human lung adenocarcinoma;NCI/ADR-RES: human breast carcinoma; NmuMG: mouse mammary normalepithelial.

FIG. 6. is a graphical summary of the results of the high-throughputcytotoxicity assay, displaying data IC₅₀ data from Table 4 and FIG. Aand FIG. 5B. Reciprocal IC₅₀ values are displayed for clarity showing anIC₅₀ range of 18 nM (5β, HCT-116) to >25 μM (e.g. 35β, all cell lines).Six library member “hits” are depicted in pyranose ⁴C₁ conformations tofacilitate structural comparisons.

FIG. 7 is a graphical summary of the results of the IC₅₀ data fromcytotoxicity assays. Reciprocal IC₅₀ values are displayed for clarity;standard errors are depicted with error bars. In the assay, live cellsare quantified by measuring the luminescent signal resulting from thereaction between cellular ATP and luciferin to form oxyluciferin. TheIC₅₀ value for each compound represents at least four replicates ofdose-response experiments conducted over six concentrations at two-folddilutions.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Glycosylated natural products are reliable platforms for the developmentof many front-line drugs, yet our understanding of the relationshipbetween attached sugars and biological activity is limited by theavailability of convenient glycosylation methods. Glycorandomization isa tool used to convert a single aglycon molecule into a library ofanalogs with a diverse array of sugar attachments.

Unless otherwise stated, the following terms used in this application,including the specification and claims, have the definitions givenbelow. As used in the specification and the appended claims, thesingular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless thecontext clearly dictates otherwise.

“Subject” means mammals and non-mammals. “Mammals” means any member ofthe class Mammalia including, but not limited to, humans, non-humanprimates such as chimpanzees and other apes and monkey species; farmanimals such as cattle, horses, sheep, goats, and swine; domesticanimals such as rabbits, dogs, and cats; laboratory animals includingrodents, such as rats, mice, and guinea pigs; and the like. Examples ofnon-mammals include, but are not limited to, birds, and the like. Theterm “subject” does not denote a particular age or sex.

“Pharmaceutically acceptable” means that which is useful in preparing apharmaceutical composition that is generally safe, non-toxic, andneither biologically nor otherwise undesirable and includes that whichis acceptable for veterinary as well as human pharmaceutical use.

A “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” as used herein means a chemicalcomposition with which a biologically active ingredient can be combinedand which, following the combination, can be used to administer theactive ingredient to a subject.

A “pharmaceutically acceptable” ester or salt as used herein means anester or salt form of the active ingredient which is compatible with anyother ingredients of the pharmaceutical composition and which is notdeleterious to the subject to which the composition is to beadministered. The terms “pharmaceutically acceptable salts” or“pro-drugs” includes the salts and prodrugs of compounds that are,within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use withpatients without undue toxicity, irritation, allergic response, and thelike, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio, and effectivefor their intended use, as well as the zwitterionic forms, wherepossible, of the compounds.

“Pro-drug” means a pharmacologically inactive form of a compound whichmust be metabolized in vivo by a subject after administration into apharmacologically active form of the compound in order to produce thedesired pharmacological effect. After administration to the subject, thepharmacologically inactive form of the compound is converted in vivounder the influence of biological fluids or enzymes into apharmacologically active form of the compound. Although metabolismoccurs for many compounds primarily in the liver, almost all othertissues and organs, especially the lung, are able to carry out varyingdegrees of metabolism. For example, metabolism of the pro-drug may takeplace by hydrolysis in blood. Pro-drug forms of compounds may beutilized, for example, to improve bioavailability, mask unpleasantcharacteristics such as bitter taste, alter solubility for intravenoususe, or to provide site-specific delivery of the compound. Reference toa compound herein includes pro-drug forms of a compound.

A discussion of the use of pro-drugs is provided by T. Higuchi and W.Stella, “Pro-drugs as Novel Delivery Systems,” Vol. 14 of the A.C.S.Symposium Series, and in Bioreversible Carriers in Drug Design, ed.Edward B. Roche, American Pharmaceutical Association and Pergamon Press,1987. For example, if a compound contains a carboxylic acid functionalgroup, a pro-drug can comprise an ester formed by the replacement of thehydrogen atom of the acid group with a group such as (C₁-C₈)alkyl,(C₂-C₁₂)alkanoyloxymethyl, 1-(alkanoyloxy)ethyl having from 4 to 9carbon atoms, 1-methyl-1-(alkanoyloxy)-ethyl having from five to tencarbon atoms, alkoxycarbonyloxymethyl having from three to six carbonatoms, 1-(alkoxycarbonyloxy)ethyl having from four to seven carbonatoms, 1-methyl-1-(alkoxycarbonyloxy)ethyl having from five to eightcarbon atoms, N-(alkoxycarbonyl)aminomethyl having from three to ninecarbon atoms, 1-(N-(alkoxycarbonyl)amino)ethyl having from four to tencarbon atoms, 3-phthalidyl, 4-crotonolactonyl, gamma-butyrolacton-4-yl,di-N,N—(C₁-C₂)alkylamino(C₂-C₃)alkyl (such as β-dimethylaminoethyl),carbamoyl-(C₁-C₂)alkyl, N,N-di(C₁-C₂)alkylcarbamoyl-(C₁-C₂)alkyl andpiperidino-, pyrrolidino- or morpholino(C₂-C₃)alkyl.

Similarly, if a compound comprises an alcohol functional group, apro-drug can be formed by the replacement of the hydrogen atom of thealcohol group with a group such as (C₁-C₆)alkanoyloxymethyl,1-(C₁-C₆)alkanoyloxy)ethyl, 1-methyl-1-(C₁-C₆)alkan-oyloxy)ethyl,(C₁-C₆)alkoxycarbonyloxymethyl, N—(C₁-C₆)alkoxycarbonylaminomethyl,succinoyl, (C₁-C₆)alkanoyl, α-amino(C₁-C₄)alkanoyl, arylacyl andalpha-aminoacyl, or alpha-aminoacyl-alpha-aminoacyl, where eachalpha-aminoacyl group is independently selected from the naturallyoccurring L-amino acids, P(O)(OH)₂, —P(O)(O(C₁-C₆)alkyl)₂ or glycosyl(the radical resulting from the removal of a hydroxyl group of thehemiacetal form of a carbohydrate).

If a compound comprises an amine functional group, a pro-drug can beformed by the replacement of a hydrogen atom in the amine group with agroup such as R-carbonyl, RO-carbonyl, NRR′-carbonyl where R and R′ areeach independently (C₁-C₁₀)alkyl, (C₃-C₇)cycloalkyl, benzyl, orR-carbonyl is a natural alpha-aminoacyl or natural alpha-aminoacyl-,—C(OH)C(O)OY wherein Y is H, (C₁-C₆)alkyl or benzyl, —C(OY₀)Y₁ whereinY₀ is (C₁-C₄) alkyl and Y₁ is ((C₁-C₆)alkyl, carboxy(C₁-C₆)alkyl,amino(C₁-C₄)alkyl or mono-N— or di-N,N—(C₁-C₆)alkylaminoalkyl, —C(Y₂) Y₃wherein Y₂ is H or methyl and Y₃ is mono-N— ordi-N,N—(C₁-C₆)-alkylamino, morpholino, piperidin-1-yl orpyrrolidin-1-yl.

The term “salts” refers to inorganic and organic salts of compounds.These salts can be prepared in situ during the final isolation andpurification of a compound, or by separately reacting a purifiedcompound with a suitable organic or inorganic acid or base, asappropriate, and isolating the salt thus formed. Representative saltsinclude the hydrobromide, hydrochloride, sulfate, bisulfate, nitrate,acetate, oxalate, palmitiate, stearate, laurate, borate, benzoate,lactate, phosphate, tosylate, besylate, esylate, citrate, maleate,fumarate, succinate, tartrate, naphthylate, mesylate, glucoheptonate,lactobionate, and laurylsulphonate salts, and the like. These mayinclude cations based on the alkali and alkaline earth metals, such assodium, lithium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and the like, as well asnon-toxic ammonium, quaternary ammonium, and amine cations including,but not limited to, ammonium, tetramethylammonium, tetraethylammonium,methylamine, dimethylamine, trimethylamine, triethylamine, ethylamine,and the like. Compounds having N-oxides of amino groups, such asproduced by reaction with hydrogen peroxide, are also encompassed.

The term “steroid” refers to a terpenoid lipid characterized by a carbonskeleton with four fused rings, arranged in a 6C-6C-6C-5C fashion. Theterm “non-digoxygenin steroid” refers to a steroid wherein the fusedfive-carbon ring is not covalently bonded to a nonfused cyclic estercontaining four carbon atoms.

A “therapeutically effective amount” means an amount of a compound that,when administered to a subject for treating a disease, is sufficient toeffect such treatment for the disease. The “therapeutically effectiveamount” will vary depending on the compound, the disease state beingtreated, the severity or the disease treated, the age and relativehealth of the subject, the route and form of administration, thejudgment of the attending medical or veterinary practitioner, and otherfactors.

For purposes of the present invention, “treating” or “treatment”describes the management and care of a patient for the purpose ofcombating the disease, condition, or disorder. The terms embrace bothpreventative, i.e., prophylactic, and palliative treatment. Treatingincludes the administration of a compound of present invention toprevent the onset of the symptoms or complications, alleviating thesymptoms or complications, or eliminating the disease, condition, ordisorder.

The form in which the active compound is administered to the cell is notcritical; the active compound need only reach the cell, directly orindirectly. The invention encompasses preparation and use of medicamentsand pharmaceutical compositions comprising a compound described hereinas an active ingredient. A neoglycoside is administered to a patient ina therapeutically effective amount. A neoglycoside can be administeredalone or as part of a pharmaceutically acceptable composition. Inaddition, a compound or composition can be administered all at once, asfor example, by a bolus injection, multiple times, such as by a seriesof tablets, or delivered substantially uniformly over a period of time,as for example, using transdermal delivery. It is also noted that thedose of the compound can be varied over time. A neoglycoside can beadministered using an immediate release formulation, a controlledrelease formulation, or combinations thereof. The term “controlledrelease” includes sustained release, delayed release, and combinationsthereof.

A pharmaceutical composition of the invention can be prepared, packaged,or sold in bulk, as a single unit dose, or as a plurality of single unitdoses. As used herein, a “unit dose” is discrete amount of thepharmaceutical composition comprising a predetermined amount of theactive ingredient. The amount of the active ingredient is generallyequal to the dosage of the active ingredient that would be administeredto a patient or a convenient fraction of such a dosage such as, forexample, one-half or one-third of such a dosage.

The relative amounts of the active ingredient, the pharmaceuticallyacceptable carrier, and any additional ingredients in a pharmaceuticalcomposition of the invention will vary, depending upon the identity,size, and condition of the human treated and further depending upon theroute by which the composition is to be administered. By way of example,the composition can comprise between 0.1% and 100% (w/w) activeingredient. A unit dose of a pharmaceutical composition of the inventionwill generally comprise from about 100 milligrams to about two grams ofthe active ingredient, and preferably comprises from about 200milligrams to about 1.0 gram of the active ingredient.

In addition, a neoglycoside can be administered alone, in combinationwith other neoglycosides, or with other pharmaceutically activecompounds. The other pharmaceutically active compounds can be selectedto treat the same disease as the neoglycoside or a different disease. Ifthe patient is to receive or is receiving multiple pharmaceuticallyactive compounds, the compounds can be administered simultaneously orsequentially in any order. For example, in the case of tablets, theactive compounds may be found in one tablet or in separate tablets,which can be administered at once or sequentially in any order. Inaddition, it should be recognized that the compositions can be differentforms. For example, one or more compounds may be delivered via a tablet,while another is administered via injection or orally as a syrup.

Another aspect of the invention relates to a kit comprising apharmaceutical composition of the invention and instructional material.Instructional material includes a publication, a recording, a diagram,or any other medium of expression which is used to communicate theusefulness of the pharmaceutical composition of the invention for one ofthe purposes set forth herein in a human. The instructional material canalso, for example, describe an appropriate dose of the pharmaceuticalcomposition of the invention. The instructional material of the kit ofthe invention can, for example, be affixed to a container which containsa pharmaceutical composition of the invention or be shipped togetherwith a container which contains the pharmaceutical composition.Alternatively, the instructional material can be shipped separately fromthe container with the intention that the instructional material and thepharmaceutical composition be used cooperatively by the recipient.

The invention also includes a kit comprising a pharmaceuticalcomposition of the invention and a delivery device for delivering thecomposition to a human. By way of example, the delivery device can be asqueezable spray bottle, a metered-dose spray bottle, an aerosol spraydevice, an atomizer, a dry powder delivery device, a self-propellingsolvent/powder-dispensing device, a syringe, a needle, a tampon, or adosage-measuring container. The kit can further comprise aninstructional material as described herein. For example, a kit maycomprise two separate pharmaceutical compositions comprisingrespectively a first composition comprising a neoglycoside or aneoglycoside agonist and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier; andcomposition comprising second pharmaceutically active compound and apharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The kit also comprises a containerfor the separate compositions, such as a divided bottle or a dividedfoil packet. Additional examples of containers include syringes, boxes,bags, and the like. Typically, a kit comprises directions for theadministration of the separate components. The kit form is particularlyadvantageous when the separate components are preferably administered indifferent dosage forms (e.g., oral and parenteral), are administered atdifferent dosage intervals, or when titration of the individualcomponents of the combination is desired by the prescribing physician.

An example of a kit is a blister pack. Blister packs are well known inthe packaging industry and are being widely used for the packaging ofpharmaceutical unit dosage forms (tablets, capsules, and the like).Blister packs generally consist of a sheet of relatively stiff materialcovered with a foil of a preferably transparent plastic material. Duringthe packaging process recesses are formed in the plastic foil. Therecesses have the size and shape of the tablets or capsules to bepacked. Next, the tablets or capsules are placed in the recesses and asheet of relatively stiff material is sealed against the plastic foil atthe face of the foil which is opposite from the direction in which therecesses were formed. As a result, the tablets or capsules are sealed inthe recesses between the plastic foil and the sheet. Preferably thestrength of the sheet is such that the tablets or capsules can beremoved from the blister pack by manually applying pressure on therecesses whereby an opening is formed in the sheet at the place of therecess. The tablet or capsule can then be removed via said opening.

It may be desirable to provide a memory aid on the kit, e.g., in theform of numbers next to the tablets or capsules whereby the numberscorrespond with the days of the regimen that the tablets or capsules sospecified should be ingested. Another example of such a memory aid is acalendar printed on the card, e.g., as follows “First Week, Monday,Tuesday, . . . etc. . . . Second Week, Monday, Tuesday,” etc. Othervariations of memory aids will be readily apparent. A “daily dose” canbe a single tablet or capsule or several pills or capsules to be takenon a given day. Also, a daily dose of a neoglycoside composition canconsist of one tablet or capsule, while a daily dose of the secondcompound can consist of several tablets or capsules and vice versa. Thememory aid should reflect this and assist in correct administration.

In another embodiment of the present invention, a dispenser designed todispense the daily doses one at a time in the order of their intendeduse is provided. Preferably, the dispenser is equipped with a memoryaid, so as to further facilitate compliance with the dosage regimen. Anexample of such a memory aid is a mechanical counter, which indicatesthe number of daily doses that have been dispensed. Another example ofsuch a memory aid is a battery-powered micro-chip memory coupled with aliquid crystal readout, or audible reminder signal which, for example,reads out the date that the last daily dose has been taken and/orreminds one when the next dose is to be taken.

A neoglycoside composition, optionally comprising other pharmaceuticallyactive compounds, can be administered to a patient either orally,rectally, parenterally, (for example, intravenously, intramuscularly, orsubcutaneously) intracisternally, intravaginally, intraperitoneally,intravesically, locally (for example, powders, ointments or drops), oras a buccal or nasal spray. Other contemplated formulations includeprojected nanoparticles, liposomal preparations, resealed erythrocytescontaining the active ingredient, and immunologically-basedformulations.

Parenteral administration of a pharmaceutical composition includes anyroute of administration characterized by physical breaching of a tissueof a human and administration of the pharmaceutical composition throughthe breach in the tissue. Parenteral administration thus includesadministration of a pharmaceutical composition by injection of thecomposition, by application of the composition through a surgicalincision, by application of the composition through a tissue-penetratingnon-surgical wound, and the like. In particular, parenteraladministration includes subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intravenous,intraarterial, intramuscular, or intrasternal injection and intravenous,intraarterial, or kidney dialytic infusion techniques.

Compositions suitable for parenteral injection comprise the activeingredient combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier such asphysiologically acceptable sterile aqueous or nonaqueous solutions,dispersions, suspensions, or emulsions, or may comprise sterile powdersfor reconstitution into sterile injectable solutions or dispersions.Examples of suitable aqueous and nonaqueous carriers, diluents,solvents, or vehicles include water, isotonic saline, ethanol, polyols(propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, glycerol, and the like),suitable mixtures thereof, triglycerides, including vegetable oils suchas olive oil, or injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate. Properfluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of a coating such aslecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the caseof dispersions, and/or by the use of surfactants. Such formulations canbe prepared, packaged, or sold in a form suitable for bolusadministration or for continuous administration. Injectable formulationscan be prepared, packaged, or sold in unit dosage form, such as inampules, in multi-dose containers containing a preservative, or insingle-use devices for auto-injection or injection by a medicalpractitioner.

Formulations for parenteral administration include suspensions,solutions, emulsions in oily or aqueous vehicles, pastes, andimplantable sustained-release or biodegradable formulations. Suchformulations can further comprise one or more additional ingredientsincluding suspending, stabilizing, or dispersing agents. In oneembodiment of a formulation for parenteral administration, the activeingredient is provided in dry (i.e. powder or granular) form forreconstitution with a suitable vehicle (e.g. sterile pyrogen-free water)prior to parenteral administration of the reconstituted composition. Thepharmaceutical compositions can be prepared, packaged, or sold in theform of a sterile injectable aqueous or oily suspension or solution.This suspension or solution can be formulated according to the knownart, and can comprise, in addition to the active ingredient, additionalingredients such as the dispersing agents, wetting agents, or suspendingagents described herein. Such sterile injectable formulations can beprepared using a non-toxic parenterally-acceptable diluent or solvent,such as water or 1,3-butanediol, for example. Other acceptable diluentsand solvents include Ringer's solution, isotonic sodium chloridesolution, and fixed oils such as synthetic mono- or di-glycerides. Otherparentally-administrable formulations which are useful include thosewhich comprise the active ingredient in microcrystalline form, in aliposomal preparation, or as a component of a biodegradable polymersystems. Compositions for sustained release or implantation can comprisepharmaceutically acceptable polymeric or hydrophobic materials such asan emulsion, an ion exchange resin, a sparingly soluble polymer, or asparingly soluble salt.

These compositions may also contain adjuvants such as preserving,wetting, emulsifying, and/or dispersing agents. Preventing microorganismcontamination of the compositions can be accomplished by the addition ofvarious antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, parabens,chlorobutanol, phenol, sorbic acid, and the like. It may also bedesirable to include isotonic agents, for example, sugars, sodiumchloride, and the like. Prolonged absorption of injectablepharmaceutical compositions can be brought about by the use of agentscapable of delaying absorption, for example, aluminum monostearateand/or gelatin.

Dosage forms can include solid or injectable implants or depots. Inpreferred embodiments, the implant comprises an effective amount of anactive agent selected from the group consisting of a neoglycoside, aneoglycoside agonist and a neoglycoside antagonist and a biodegradablepolymer. In preferred embodiments, a suitable biodegradable polymer canbe selected from the group consisting of a polyaspartate, polyglutamate,poly(L-lactide), a poly(D,L-lactide), a poly(lactide-co-glycolide), apoly(ε-caprolactone), a polyanhydride, a poly(beta-hydroxy butyrate), apoly(ortho ester) and a polyphosphazene. In other embodiments, theimplant comprises an effective amount of active agent and a silasticpolymer. The implant provides the release of an effective amount ofactive agent for an extended period of about one week to several years.

Solid dosage forms for oral administration include capsules, tablets,powders, and granules. In such solid dosage forms, the active compoundis admixed with at least one inert customary excipient (or carrier) suchas sodium citrate or dicalcium phosphate or (a) fillers or extenders, asfor example, starches, lactose, sucrose, mannitol, or silicic acid; (b)binders, as for example, carboxymethylcellulose, alginates, gelatin,polyvinylpyrrolidone, sucrose, or acacia; (c) humectants, as forexample, glycerol; (d) disintegrating agents, as for example, agar-agar,calcium carbonate, potato or tapioca starch, alginic acid, certaincomplex silicates, or sodium carbonate; (e) solution retarders, as forexample, paraffin; (f) absorption accelerators, as for example,quaternary ammonium compounds; (g) wetting agents, as for example, cetylalcohol or glycerol monostearate; (h) adsorbents, as for example, kaolinor bentonite; and/or (i) lubricants, as for example, talc, calciumstearate, magnesium stearate, solid polyethylene glycols, sodium laurylsulfate, or mixtures thereof. In the case of capsules and tablets, thedosage forms may also comprise buffering agents.

A tablet comprising the active ingredient can, for example, be made bycompressing or molding the active ingredient, optionally with one ormore additional ingredients. Compressed tablets can be prepared bycompressing, in a suitable device, the active ingredient in afree-flowing form such as a powder or granular preparation, optionallymixed with one or more of a binder, a lubricant, an excipient, a surfaceactive agent, and a dispersing agent. Molded tablets can be made bymolding, in a suitable device, a mixture of the active ingredient, apharmaceutically acceptable carrier, and at least sufficient liquid tomoisten the mixture. Pharmaceutically acceptable excipients used in themanufacture of tablets include inert diluents, granulating anddisintegrating agents, binding agents, and lubricating agents. Knowndispersing agents include potato starch and sodium starch glycolate.Known surface active agents include sodium lauryl sulfate. Knowndiluents include calcium carbonate, sodium carbonate, lactose,microcrystalline cellulose, calcium phosphate, calcium hydrogenphosphate, and sodium phosphate. Known granulating and disintegratingagents include corn starch and alginic acid. Known binding agentsinclude gelatin, acacia, pre-gelatinized maize starch,polyvinylpyrrolidone, and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Knownlubricating agents include magnesium stearate, stearic acid, silica, andtalc.

Tablets can be non-coated or they can be coated using known methods toachieve delayed disintegration in the gastrointestinal tract of a human,thereby providing sustained release and absorption of the activeingredient. By way of example, a material such as glyceryl monostearateor glyceryl distearate can be used to coat tablets. Further by way ofexample, tablets can be coated using methods described in U.S. Pat. Nos.4,256,108; 4,160,452; and 4,265,874 to form osmotically-controlledrelease tablets. Tablets can further comprise a sweetening agent, aflavoring agent, a coloring agent, a preservative, or some combinationof these in order to provide pharmaceutically elegant and palatablepreparation.

Solid dosage forms such as tablets, dragees, capsules, and granules canbe prepared with coatings or shells, such as enteric coatings and otherswell known in the art. They may also contain opacifying agents, and canalso be of such composition that they release the active compound orcompounds in a delayed manner. Examples of embedding compositions thatcan be used are polymeric substances and waxes. The active compounds canalso be in micro-encapsulated form, if appropriate, with one or more ofthe above-mentioned excipients.

Solid compositions of a similar type may also be used as fillers in softor hard filled gelatin capsules using such excipients as lactose or milksugar, as well as high molecular weight polyethylene glycols, and thelike. Hard capsules comprising the active ingredient can be made using aphysiologically degradable composition, such as gelatin. Such hardcapsules comprise the active ingredient, and can further compriseadditional ingredients including, for example, an inert solid diluentsuch as calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, or kaolin. Soft gelatincapsules comprising the active ingredient can be made using aphysiologically degradable composition, such as gelatin; Such softcapsules comprise the active ingredient, which can be mixed with wateror an oil medium such as peanut oil, liquid paraffin, or olive oil.

Oral compositions can be made, using known technology, whichspecifically release orally-administered agents in the small or largeintestines of a human patient. For example, formulations for delivery tothe gastrointestinal system, including the colon, include enteric coatedsystems, based, e.g., on methacrylate copolymers such aspoly(methacrylic acid, methyl methacrylate), which are only soluble atpH 6 and above, so that the polymer only begins to dissolve on entryinto the small intestine. The site where such polymer formulationsdisintegrate is dependent on the rate of intestinal transit and theamount of polymer present. For example, a relatively thick polymercoating is used for delivery to the proximal colon (Hardy et al.,Aliment. Pharmacol. Therap. (1987) 1:273-280). Polymers capable ofproviding site-specific colonic delivery can also be used, wherein thepolymer relies on the bacterial flora of the large bowel to provideenzymatic degradation of the polymer coat and hence release of the drug.For example, azopolymers (U.S. Pat. No. 4,663,308), glycosides (Friendet al., J. Med. Chem. (1984) 27:261-268) and a variety of naturallyavailable and modified polysaccharides (see PCT applicationPCT/GB89/00581) can be used in such formulations.

Pulsed release technology such as that described in U.S. Pat. No.4,777,049 can also be used to administer the active agent to a specificlocation within the gastrointestinal tract. Such systems permit drugdelivery at a predetermined time and can be used to deliver the activeagent, optionally together with other additives that my alter the localmicroenvironment to promote agent stability and uptake, directly to thecolon, without relying on external conditions other than the presence ofwater to provide in vivo release.

Liquid dosage forms for oral administration include pharmaceuticallyacceptable emulsions, solutions, suspensions, syrups, and elixirs. Inaddition to the active compounds, the liquid dosage form may containinert diluents commonly used in the art, such as water or othersolvents, isotonic saline, solubilizing agents and emulsifiers, as forexample, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl carbonate, ethylacetate, benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, propylene glycol, 1,3-butyleneglycol, dimethylformamide, oils, in particular, almond oil, arachis oil,coconut oil, cottonseed oil, groundnut oil, corn germ oil, olive oil,castor oil, sesame seed oil, MIGLYOL™, glycerol, fractionated vegetableoils, mineral oils such as liquid paraffin, tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol,polyethylene glycols, fatty acid esters of sorbitan, or mixtures ofthese substances, and the like. Besides such inert diluents, thecomposition can also include adjuvants, such as wetting agents,emulsifying and suspending agents, demulcents, preservatives, buffers,salts, sweetening, flavoring, coloring and perfuming agents.Suspensions, in addition to the active compound, may contain suspendingagents, as for example, ethoxyated isostearyl alcohols, polyoxyethylenesorbitol or sorbitan esters, microcrystalline cellulose, hydrogenatededible fats, sodium alginate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, gum tragacanth, gumacacia, agar-agar, and cellulose derivatives such as sodiumcarboxymethylcellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose,aluminum metahydroxide, bentonite, or mixtures of these substances, andthe like. Liquid formulations of a pharmaceutical composition of theinvention that are suitable for oral administration can be prepared,packaged, and sold either in liquid form or in the form of a dry productintended for reconstitution with water or another suitable vehicle priorto use.

Known dispersing or wetting agents include naturally-occurringphosphatides such as lecithin, condensation products of an alkyleneoxide with a fatty acid, with a long chain aliphatic alcohol, with apartial ester derived from a fatty acid and a hexitol, or with a partialester derived from a fatty acid and a hexitol anhydride (e.g.polyoxyethylene stearate, heptadecaethyleneoxycetanol, polyoxyethylene,sorbitol monooleate, and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate,respectively). Known emulsifying agents include lecithin and acacia.Known preservatives include methyl, ethyl, orn-propyl-para-hydroxybenzoates, ascorbic acid, and sorbic acid. Knownsweetening agents include, for example, glycerol, propylene glycol,sorbitol, sucrose, and saccharin. Known thickening agents for oilysuspensions include, for example, beeswax, hard paraffin, and cetylalcohol.

Liquid solutions of the active ingredient in aqueous or oily solventscan be prepared in substantially the same manner as liquid suspensions,the primary difference being that the active ingredient is dissolved,rather than suspended in the solvent. Liquid solutions of thepharmaceutical composition of the invention can comprise each of thecomponents described with regard to liquid suspensions, it beingunderstood that suspending agents will not necessarily aid dissolutionof the active ingredient in the solvent. Aqueous solvents include, forexample, water and isotonic saline. Oily solvents include, for example,almond oil, oily esters, ethyl alcohol, vegetable oils such as arachis,olive, sesame, or coconut oil, fractionated vegetable oils, and mineraloils such as liquid paraffin.

In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition can be prepared asa nutraceutical, i.e., in the form of, or added to, a food (e.g., aprocessed item intended for direct consumption) or a foodstuff (e.g., anedible ingredient intended for incorporation into a food prior toingestion). Examples of suitable foods include candies such aslollipops, baked goods such as crackers, breads, cookies, and snackcakes, whole, pureed, or mashed fruits and vegetables, beverages, andprocessed meat products. Examples of suitable foodstuffs include milledgrains and sugars, spices and other seasonings, and syrups. Thepolypeptide compositions described herein are preferably not exposed tohigh cooking temperatures for extended periods of time, in order tominimize degradation of the compounds.

Compositions for rectal or vaginal administration can be prepared bymixing a neoglycoside and any additional compounds with suitablenon-irritating excipients or carriers such as cocoa butter, polyethyleneglycol or a suppository wax, which are solid at ordinary roomtemperature, but liquid at body temperature, and therefore, melt in therectum or vaginal cavity and release the neoglycoside. Such acomposition can be in the form of, for example, a suppository, aretention enema preparation, and a solution for rectal or colonicirrigation. Suppository formulations can further comprise variousadditional ingredients including antioxidants and preservatives.Retention enema preparations or solutions for rectal or colonicirrigation can be made by combining the active ingredient with apharmaceutically acceptable liquid carrier. As is known in the art,enema preparations can be administered using, and can be packagedwithin, a delivery device adapted to the rectal anatomy of a human.Enema preparations can further comprise various additional ingredientsincluding antioxidants and preservatives.

A pharmaceutical composition of the invention can be prepared, packaged,or sold in a formulation suitable for vaginal administration. Such acomposition can be in the form of, for example, a suppository, animpregnated or coated vaginally-insertable material such as a tampon, adouche preparation, or a solution for vaginal irrigation.

Dosage forms for topical administration of a neoglycoside includeointments, powders, sprays and inhalants. The compounds are admixedunder sterile conditions with a physiologically acceptable carrier, andany preservatives, buffers, and/or propellants that may be required.Formulations suitable for topical administration include liquid orsemi-liquid preparations such as liniments, lotions, oil-in-water orwater-in-oil emulsions such as creams, ointments or pastes, andsolutions or suspensions. Topically-administrable formulations can, forexample, comprise from about 0.1% to about 10% (w/w) active ingredient,although the concentration of the active ingredient can be as high asthe solubility limit of the active ingredient in the solvent.Formulations for topical administration can further comprise one or moreof the additional ingredients described herein.

Ophthalmic formulations, eye ointments, powders, and solutions are alsocontemplated as being within the scope of this invention. Suchformulations can, for example, be in the form of eye drops including,for example, a 0.1-1.0% (w/w) solution or suspension of the activeingredient in an aqueous or oily liquid carrier. Such drops can furthercomprise buffering agents, salts, or one or more other of the additionalingredients described herein. In other embodiments, ophthalmalmicallyadministrable formulations comprise the active ingredient inmicrocrystalline form or in a liposomal preparation.

A pharmaceutical composition of the invention can be prepared, packaged,or sold in a formulation suitable for pulmonary administration via thebuccal cavity. Such a formulation can comprise dry particles whichcomprise the active ingredient and which have a diameter in the rangefrom about 0.5 to about 7 nanometers, and preferably from about one toabout six nanometers. Such compositions are conveniently in the form ofdry powders for administration using a device comprising a dry powderreservoir to which a stream of propellant can be directed to dispersethe powder or using a self-propelling solvent/powder-dispensingcontainer such as a device comprising the active ingredient dissolved orsuspended in a low-boiling propellant in a sealed container. Preferably,such powders comprise particles wherein at least 98% of the particles byweight have a diameter greater than 0.5 nanometers and at least 95% ofthe particles by number have a diameter less than seven nanometers. Morepreferably, at least 95% of the particles by weight have a diametergreater than one nanometer and at least 90% of the particles by numberhave a diameter less than six nanometers. Dry powder compositionspreferably include a solid fine powder diluent such as sugar and areconveniently provided in a unit dose form.

Low boiling propellants generally include liquid propellants having aboiling point below 65 degrees F. at atmospheric pressure. Generally thepropellant can constitute 50 to 99.9% (w/w) of the composition, and theactive ingredient can constitute 0.1 to 20% (w/w) of the composition.The propellant can further comprise additional ingredients such as aliquid non-ionic or solid anionic surfactant or a solid diluent(preferably having a particle size of the same order as particlescomprising the active ingredient).

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention formulated for pulmonarydelivery can also provide the active ingredient in the form of dropletsof a solution or suspension. Such formulations can be prepared,packaged, or sold as aqueous or dilute alcoholic solutions orsuspensions, optionally sterile, comprising the active ingredient, andcan conveniently be administered using any nebulization or atomizationdevice. Such formulations can further comprise one or more additionalingredients including a flavoring agent such as saccharin sodium, avolatile oil, a buffering agent, a surface active agent, or apreservative such as methylhydroxybenzoate. The droplets provided bythis route of administration preferably have an average diameter in therange from about 0.1 to about 200 nanometers.

The formulations described herein as being useful for pulmonary deliveryare also useful for intranasal delivery of a pharmaceutical compositionof the invention. Another formulation suitable for intranasaladministration is a coarse powder comprising the active ingredient andhaving an average particle from about 0.2 to 500 micrometers. Such aformulation is administered in the manner in which snuff is taken i.e.by rapid inhalation through the nasal passage from a container of thepowder held close to the nares. Formulations suitable for nasaladministration can, for example, comprise from about as little as 0.1%(w/w) and as much as 100% (w/w) of the active ingredient, and canfurther comprise one or more of the additional ingredients describedherein.

A pharmaceutical composition of the invention can be prepared, packaged,or sold in a formulation suitable for buccal administration. Suchformulations can, for example, be in the form of tablets or lozengesmade using conventional methods, and can, for example, comprise 0.1 to20% (w/w) active ingredient, the balance comprising an orallydissolvable or degradable composition and, optionally, one or more ofthe additional ingredients described herein. Alternately, formulationssuitable for buccal administration can comprise a powder or anaerosolized or atomized solution or suspension comprising the activeingredient. Such powdered, aerosolized, or atomized formulations, whendispersed, preferably have an average particle or droplet size in therange from about 0.1 to about 200 nanometers, and can further compriseone or more of the additional ingredients described herein.

For parenteral administration in non-human animals, the compound orcompounds may be prepared in the form of a paste or a pellet andadministered as an implant, usually under the skin of the head or ear ofthe animal. Paste formulations can be prepared by dispersing a compoundor compounds in pharmaceutically acceptable oil such as peanut oil,sesame oil, corn oil or the like. Pellets containing a therapeuticallyeffective amount of a compound or compounds can be prepared by admixingthe compound with a diluent such as a carbowax, carnauba wax, and thelike, and a lubricant, such as magnesium or calcium stearate, can beadded to improve the pelleting process. It is, of course, recognizedthat more than one pellet may be administered to an animal to achievethe desired dose level. Moreover, it has been found that such implantsmay also be administered periodically during the animal treatment periodin order to maintain the proper active agent level in the animal's body.

The neoglycoside of the present invention, the stereoisomers andprodrugs thereof, and the pharmaceutically acceptable salts of thepeptides, stereoisomers, and prodrugs, can be administered to a patientat dosage levels in the range of from about 0.01 to about 1,000 mg perday. For a normal adult human having a body weight of about 70 kg, adosage in the range of from about 0.01 to about 300 mg is typicallysufficient. However, some variability in the general dosage range may berequired depending upon the age and weight of the subject being treated,the intended route of administration, the particular compound beingadministered and the like. The determination of dosage ranges andoptimal dosages for a particular patient is well within the ability ofone of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the instantdisclosure. It is also noted that the compounds of the present inventioncan be used in sustained release, controlled release, and delayedrelease formulations, which forms are also well known to one of ordinaryskill in the art.

It is not critical whether the compound is administered directly to thecell, to a tissue comprising the cell, a body fluid that contacts thecell, or a body location from which the compound can diffuse or betransported to the cell. It is sufficient that the compound isadministered to the patient in an amount and by a route whereby anamount of the compound sufficient to mobilize lipids in the cellarrives, directly or indirectly at the cell. The minimum amount varieswith the identity of the neoglycoside. In some embodiments, the minimumamount is generally in the range from 10⁻⁹ to 10⁻⁵ molar. In otherembodiments, the minimum amount is typically in the range from 10⁻⁷ to10⁻⁵ molar.

In preferred embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition comprising aneoglycoside can be administered to a patient at dosage levels in therange of about 0.1 to about 7,000 mg per day. A preferred dosage rangeis about 1 to about 100 mg per day. In other embodiments, apharmaceutical composition comprising a neoglycoside can be administeredto deliver a dose of between one nanogram per day per kilogram bodyweight and 100 milligrams per day per kilogram body weight, preferablyfrom about 0.1 to about 10 mg/kg body weight of the individual per day,and preferably to deliver of between 100 milligrams and 2 grams, to ahuman patient.

The specific dosage and dosage range that can be used depends on anumber of factors, including the requirements of the patient, theseverity of the condition or disease being treated, and thepharmacological activity of the compound being administered. Thedetermination of dosage ranges and optimal dosages for a particularpatient is well within the ordinary skill of one in the art in view ofthis disclosure. It is understood that the ordinarily skilled physicianor veterinarian will readily determine and prescribe an effective amountof the compound to mobilize lipid stores, induce weight loss, or inhibitappetite in the patient. In so proceeding, the physician or veterinariancan, for example, prescribe a relatively low dose at first, subsequentlyincreasing the dose until an appropriate response is obtained. It isfurther understood, however, that the specific dose level for anyparticular human will depend upon a variety of factors including theactivity of the specific compound employed, the age, body weight,general health, gender, and diet of the human, the time ofadministration, the route of administration, the rate of excretion, anydrug combination, and the severity of any disorder being treated.

In some embodiments, a neoglycoside of the present invention, astereoisomer or prodrug thereof, or a pharmaceutically acceptable saltof the stereoisomer or prodrug; is administered to a subject in need oftreatment therewith, preferably in the form of a pharmaceuticalcomposition. It is generally preferred that such administration be oralor pulmonary. However, if the subject being treated is unable toswallow, or oral administration is otherwise impaired or undesirable,parenteral or transdermal administration will be appropriate.

Chemoselective ligation reactions are means for expanding naturalproduct sugar diversity. This approach is particularly attractive tocomplex natural products as chemoselective ligation offer advantagessimilar to those of enzymatic reactions (efficiency, regio- andstereospecificity), with the advantage of a much broader range ofcoupling partners. See Hang, H. C. et al., Acc. Chem. Res. (2001) 34,727-736; Kolb, H. C. et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2001) 40, 2004-2021;Langenhan, J. M. et al., Curr. Org. Syn. (2005) 2, 59-81.

In the context of sugars (e.g. an aldose, 127, see below), one wellknown reaction is that between a free aldose and an aminooxyfunctionalized molecule to specifically provide the sugar oxime withoutthe requirement of protecting groups or anomeric activation. Thisreaction, when using a reacting unit bearing a ‘primary’ —O—NH₂ group,leads to the open-chain sugar oxime. However, it was recently reportedthat the cyclic form of the sugar is restored when a ‘secondary’hydroxylamino group (R—O—NH—R′) is used (e.g. 128 to 130). SeeLangenhan, J. M. et al., Chem. Comm. (2004) 623. This strategy has beenemployed in coupling simple sugars to peptides (termed‘neoglycopeptides’). See Peri, F. et al., Tetrahedron (1998) 54, 12269;Carrasco, M. R. et. al., Tetrahedron Lett. (2002) 43, 5727; Carrasco, M.R. et. al., J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 195; Carrasco, M. R. et al., J. Org.Chem. (2003) 68, 8853. More recently, the approach has been used togenerate a small set of di- and trisaccharides (termed ‘neoglycosides’).Peri, F. et. al., Chem. Comm. (2002) 1504; Peri, F. et al., Chem. Comm.(2004) 623.

In examples using Glc or GlcNAc as the sugar donors, the product wasfound to favor the β-neogycoside (α:β=7:1) and characterization/modelingvia NMR spectroscopy, ab initio, molecular mechanics and moleculardynamics methods revealed the neoglycosides to exhibit only slightconformational distortion in comparison to the correspondingO-glycosides (Peri, F. et. al., Chem. Eur. J. (2004) 10, 1433).

Digitoxin Neoglycorandomization. To assess the application of thisstrategy toward natural product ‘neoglycorandomization’ (the term basedupon an extension of existing nomenclature), the simple model naturalproduct aglycon digitoxigenin was selected. Digitalis (mainly digitoxinand digoxin, extracts from Digitalis purpurea and Digitalis lanata usedclinically, respectively) has been used as a cardiac drug for more than200 years. The cardiac glycosides contain a steroid nucleus andunsaturated lactone (together referred to as the aglycon) substitutedwith a carbohydrate(s)—the general role of the latter of which isattributed primarily to absorption and pharmacokinetics. In addition,digitalis is known to block cell proliferation, induce apoptosis indifferent malignant cell lines, signal through the pathways of epidermalgrowth factor receptor (EGFR), and these compelling links to anticanceractivities can, in part, be modulated by saccharide substitutions.

Commercially available digitoxigenin 131 was converted to ketone 132, asshown above (81% yield) using Jones oxidation (reaction conditions:0.742 mmol 131, 31 mL acetone, cool to 0° C., Jones agent added dropwiseuntil orange color persisted, quenched with MeOH after 20 min).²³⁴Ketone 132 was subsequently reacted with methoxyamine in the presence ofpyridine in methanolic solution to afford a mixture of E and Z oximes inquantitative yield (reaction conditions: 0.219 mmol 132 dissolved in 0.5mL MeOH, 2.2. eq. pyridine, then MeONH₂HCl added, 30 min).²³⁵ A varietyof reducing agents were examined for oxime reduction, includingK-selectride, NaBH₃CN, pyridine-borane complex and t-butylamine-boranecomplex, with the latter providing the desired methoxyamines 133 and 134in the desired quantitative production of a 50:50 ratio (reactionconditions: 0.159 mm oxime suspended in 0.23 mL EtOH, 1 mL dioxane,cooled to 0° C., added 3.3. eq. borane complex, then 0.43 mL 10% aq. HClsolution, 1 hr). Diastereomers 133 and 134 were easily separated usingstandard chromatography (EtOAc:hexane 3:2 followed by 100% EtOAc for thesecond product). As a test for neoglycorandomization, methoxyamine 133was subsequently reacted with sugars 27-58, as shown below, (0.1 mmol133, 2 eq. aldose, DMSO, 50° C., 12 hr) to provide >70% product yieldfor 25 of the 31 sugars examined based upon LC-MS.²³⁶ Of the 31 cardiacglycoside variants generated in this proof of concept demonstration,those deriving from 38, 39 and 52 present the opportunity for furtherdiversification via Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, while thosederiving from 34, 41 and 48 present handles for rapid alkylation.

For example, the simple structure of digitoxin allows the easyinstallation of a reactive chemical handle, as shown below:

Studies have suggested that digitoxin and/or carbohydrate-altereddigitoxin derivatives may display anti-cancer activities (Haux, J. Med.Hypotheses (2002) 59, 781; Stenkvist, B. Anti-Cancer Drugs (2002) 12,635). In order to obtain these digitoxin derivatives, chemoselectiveligation is done using methoxyamino group. The methoxyamino groups arereacted with free sugars to form closed-ring neoglycosides (unlikeR—ONH₂ groups which form predominately open-chain sugar oximes). Theligations are high yielding and often stereoselective.

Installation of methoxyamino group occurs quantitatively. Isomers may beassigned via x-ray crystallography. The one-step digitoxin todigitoxigenone conversion (step 1) as shown below:

The effect of different ligation conditions were evaluated for D-glucoseas shown below:

DMF/AcOH temp agitation % conv. Isomer ratio eq. glucose (° C.) methodby NMR R 3:1 1.05 60 stirring 70% S 3:1 1.05 60 stirring 74% S 3:1 2 rmtemp shaking 65% S 3:1 2 60 shaking 71% S 1:1 2 60 shaking −24% 

Neoglycorandomization Strategies—Amine Modification (Indolocarbazolesand Anthracyclines). As an expansion of neoglycorandomization, a secondcomplimentary handle was installed to target amines within naturalproducts. Specifically, amine-handle 159, as shown below was synthesizedas shown below and used to acylate the daunosamine sugar within 4 and 5as well as the indole nitrogen(s) in various indolocarbazole aglycons(e.g. exemplified by the staurosporine aglycon 161). Literatureprecendent exists for acylation of both daunosamine (Ingallinella, P.et. al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. (2001) 11, 1343-1346 andindolocarbazole nitrogens¹⁶ with diacylation, in some cases of thelatter, observed in the presence of excess acylating agent. Thepredicted outcome for this approach is identical to that described forcarbonyl installation with the exception that the parentmethoxyamino-installed natural product (e.g. 160 and 162) consists as asingle species (versus diastereomers from oxime reduction). Thus,initial library size is estimated at approximately 150 derivatives foreach indolocarbazole and anthracycline input.

The methoxyamino-aglycon may be reacted with a collection ofcommercially available and synthetic reducing saccharides. (See below)Some of these sugars may contain orthogonal chemoselective ligationhandles allowing further diversification. Such reactions may be run andpurified in parallel.

There are numerous advantages to practicing this invention, includingpotential automated synthesis of glycoconjugates, especially since thismethodology is very systematic and high yielding.

Further, the invention has potential to be coupled to a solid supportfor further automation. Such solid supports and mechanism for usingthese supports are well known in the art. For example, a conjugate withprotected handle-bearing carbohydrate may be deprotected such that anext carbohydrate may be added. This process may allow iterative cyclesbetween deprotection, extension and congugation, and could be applied toany glycoconjugate (peptides, proteins, oligosaccharides, nucleic acids,small molecules, etc.).

This deprotection, extension and congugation iterative cycle could alsobe used specifically to extend natural product glyconjugates therebygenerating oligosaccharide-substituted natural products (i.e. smallmolecules, metabolites, etc). In addition, approaches towardoligosaccharide-based bioactive secondary metabolites (i.e. naturalproducts, small molecules) would benefit by this chemistry—notably,aminoglycosides, orthosomycins (evernimicin, avilamycin) andsaccharomicins as representative examples.

Further, since this chemistry is amenable to certain physiologicalconditions (e.g. acidic tissues and/or cellular locales) ‘scavenging’ ofcarbohydrates in vivo may be possible. In placing the handle upon anappropriate carrier aglycon (i.e. natural product, metabolite, smallmolecule), one of ordinary skill in the art can potentially selectivelystarve certain cells of energy.

The chemistry is not limited to only the digitoxin, indolocarbazole oranthracycline compounds—all carbonyls, amines and potentially hydroxylsare accessible, and contemplated to be within the scope of the presentinvention. Furthermore, this chemistry is not only limited to thosecarbohydrates explicitly shown herein but any reducing sugar. Especiallygiven the selectivity towards reducing sugars, this chemistry isamenable to assaying reducing sugar concentrations and therefore,amenable to assaying any sugar-utilizing enzyme/system in which reducingsugar concentrations change.

In an effort to explore the contribution of the sugar constituents ofpharmaceutically relevant glycosylated natural products, chemoenzymatic“glycorandomization” methods have been developed (FIG. 1A, path B) torapidly convert a single aglycon structure into a library of analogswith a broad array of sugar attachments. Despite these advances,chemoenzymatic glycorandomization currently excludes a number ofessential glycoconjugates since it is limited to natural products forwhich promiscuous glycosyltransferases are available and can operate invitro. This complementary robust chemical approach—referred to as“neoglycorandomization”—accomplishes a one step sugar ligation whichdoes not require any prior sugar protection or activation (FIG. 1A, pathA). Using digitoxin as a simple pharmaceutically-relevant model,neoglycorandomization leads to the discovery of digitoxin analogs thatare much more potent and/or tumor-specific cytotoxins, but less potentNa⁺/K⁺-ATPase inhibitors, relative to the parent natural product. Thus,neoglycosylation is useful as a general tool for glycobiology and drugdiscovery. The studies also highlight a potentially divergentrelationship between Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase inhibition and cytotoxicity ofcardiac glycosides.

Neoglycorandomization is based upon the chemoselective formation ofglycosidic bonds between reducing sugars and a secondaryalkoxyamine-containing aglycon to form “neoglycosides” (FIG. 1A, pathA). The notable advantage of this approach is, unlike most traditionalchemical glycosylation reactions, unprotected and non-activated reducingsugars are used as sugar donors in the reaction under mild conditions(Van Vranken, D. L. et al., J. Org. Chem. (2000) 65, 7541-7553). Inearly examples of this chemoselective reaction, sugars and peptides thatcontain secondary alkoxyamines were reacted with D-glucose, D-mannose,D-galactose, lactose, and D-N-acetylglucosamine to generateoligosaccharide and glycopeptide mimics, respectively (Peri, F. et al.,Chem. Comm. (2002) 1504-1505; Carrasco, M. R. et al. J. Org. Chem.(2003) 68, 8853-8858). These pioneering studies revealed that, unlikeprimary alkoxyamines which provide open-chain oxime isomers (Cervigni,S. E. et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (1996) 35, 1230-1232), secondaryalkoxyamines react to form closed-ring neoglycosides (FIG. 1B). Althoughthe stability of these model neoglycosides was not examined, thedistribution of pyranose, and occasionally furanose, anomers inneoglycosides was found to be dependant on the identity of the sugar(Peri, F. et al., Tetrahedron (1998) 54, 12269-12278) and, equilibrationbetween the product isomers is sometimes observed. Closed-ringneoglycosides were found to display conformational behavior similar tonatural O-glycosides by NMR studies, molecular dynamics simulations, andab initio calculations (Peri, F. et al., Chem. Eur. J. (2004) 10,1433-1444).

Aglycon Synthesis. Compounds 2a,b, 3β, and 3α were synthesized accordingto procedures described below.

Digitoxigenone oximes (2a,b). Jones reagent was prepared by mixing CrO₃(62.4 g), H₂SO₄ (55.2 mL), and water (170 mL). This reagent was slowlyadded to an Erlynmeyer flask containing digitoxin (29.67 g, 38.8 mmol)suspended in acetone (1300 mL) at 0° C. The resulting mixture wasmechanically stirred for 3 h at rm temp. The mixture was then cooled to0° C., quenched with ˜100 mL MeOH, stirred for 20 min, and 100 mL waterwas added. Volatile solvents were removed under reduced pressure, andthe aqueous mixture was extracted with chloroform (4×200 mL). Thecombined organic layers were washed with sat. aq. NaHCO₃, 2 times withwater, dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered, then concentrated. The productketone digitoxigenone (9.48 g, 66% yield), obtained as a white foam (TLCR_(f)=0.23 in 3:2 EtOAc/hexane), was used without further purification.¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 5.89 (s, 1H), 5.03 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.2,1.5), 4.94 (B of ABX, 1H, J=18.2, 1.7), 2.82 (m, 1H), 2.65 (dd, 1H,J=14.5), 2.37 (td, 1H, J=14.8, 5.4), 2.17 (m, 4H), 2.04 (m, 2H),1.96-1.73 (m, 6H), 1.67 (m, 1H), 1.61-1.23 (m, 7H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 0.92(s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 12.9, 175.0, 174.7, 117.5, 85.0,77.4, 73.6, 50.8, 49.7, 43.7, 42.1, 41.4, 39.7, 37.1, 36.7, 36.5, 35.2,33.0, 26.9, 26.5, 22.5, 21.2, 20.9, 15.8; Electrospray ionization-MS m/z(M+H) calculated for C₂₃H₃₃O₄ 373.5, observed 373.2. Digitoxigenone(9.48 g, 25.5 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (57 mL) and pyridine (4.5mL, 55.9 mmol). Methoxyamine hydrochloride (3.40 g, 0.7 mmol) was added,and the solution was stirred for 30 min then concentrated. The resultingresidue was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ and washed with 1 M HC1, brine, driedover MgSO₄, filtered, and then concentrated. The desired mixture ofoxime diastereomers 2a,b (TLC R_(f)=0.49 and 0.39 in 3:2 EtOAc/hexane),obtained as a white crust (9.30 g, 91% yield), was used without furtherpurification. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 5.88 (br t, 1H), 5.03-4.90 (m,1H), 4.85-4.80 (m, 1H), 3.82 (s, 1.3H), 3.81 (s, 1.7H), 3.01 (br d,0.6H, J=14.9), 2.87-2.77 (m, 1.5H), 2.45 (t, 0.6H, J=13.9), 2.19-1.11(m, 23H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 174.8, 174.7, 160.4, 60.3, 117.7,85.4, 77.4, 73.6, 61.1, 50.9, 49.7, 43.5, 41.8, 41.7, 39.9, 36.8, 36.5,36.2, 35.8, 35.7, 35.6, 33.1, 32.0, 27.0, 26.9, 26.5, 25.6, 23.0, 22.9,21.2, 21.1, 20.5, 15.8; Electrospray ionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculatedfor C₂₄H₃₆NO₄ 402.5, observed 402.3.

Aglycons 3β and 3α. Oximes 2a,b (539 mg, 1.34 mmol) were suspended inethanol (1.9 mL) and dioxane (5 mL), then cooled to 0° C. Boranetert-butylamine complex (385 mg, 4.43 mmol) was added, followed by thedropwise addition 10% aq. HCl (3.6 mL). The reaction mixture was stirredat 0° C. for 2.5 hours. After this time, Na₂CO₃ was added until gasevolution ceased, and the mixture was partitioned between sat. aq.NaHCO₃ and CH₂Cl₂. The organic layer was dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered,and concentrated. The crude reaction mixture was purified via SiO₂column chromatography eluting with 3:2 EtOAc/hexane to elute 3β (TLCR_(f)=0.33 in 3:2 EtOAc/hexane) and then with 100% EtOAc to elute 3α(TLC R_(f)=0.09 in 3:2 EtOAc/hexane). Aglycon 3β was obtained as a foam(137 mg, 25% yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 5.88 (s, 1H), 4.99 (A ofABX, 1H, J=18.0, 1.6), 4.81 (B of ABX, 1H, J=18.0, 1.5), 3.55 (s, 3H),3.26 (br s, 1H), 2.79 (m, 1H), 2.15 (m, 2H), 1.85 (m, 3H), 1.74-1.22 (m,17H), 0.94 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 174.7,174.6, 117.8, 85.7, 73.6, 62.6, 55.1, 51.1, 49.7, 42.0, 40.1, 36.7,35.8, 35.7, 33.3, 30.5, 28.8, 27.0, 26.7, 23.9, 22.9, 21.3, 21.2, 15.9;Electrospray ionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculated for C₂₄H₃₈NO₄ 404.6,observed 404.4. Aglycon 3α was obtained as a white powder (227 mg, 44%yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 5.86 (s, 1H), 4.98 (A of ABX, 1H,J=18.1, 1.4), 4.80 (B of ABX, 1H, J=18.1, 1.7), 3.55 (s, 3H), 2.91 (tt,1H, J=11.1, 3.9), 2.76 (m, 1H), 2.15 (m, 2H), 1.84 (m, 3H), 1.86-1.17(m, 17H), 0.93 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 175.2,174.6, 117.3, 85.1, 73.5, 62.5, 60.3, 50.8, 49.6, 41.8, 41.5, 39.8,36.1, 35.3, 35.0, 33.0, 30.9, 27.0, 26.8, 25.3, 23.4, 21.5, 20.8, 15.7;Electrospray ionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculated for C₂₄H₃₈NO₄ 404.6,observed 404.4.

Neoglycoside 4β. Aglycon 3β (18.4 mg, 45.6 μmol) and D-glucose (8.6 mg,47.9 μmol) were dissolved in 3:1 DMF/AcOH (500 μL) and stirred at 60° C.for 48 h. The crude reaction mixture was concentrated, and examined by¹H NMR to reveal a 4β:3β ratio of 7:3 (70% crude yield). Neoglycoside 4μl: (TLC R_(f)=0.27 in 20% EtOH/CHCl₃) ¹H NMR (CD₃OD, 500 MHz) δ 5.90(s, 1H), 5.03 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.3, 1.1), 4.92 (B of ABX, 1H, J=18.3,1.4), 4.09 (d, 1H, J=8.8), 3.81 (A of ABX, 0.5H, J=12.0, 1.9), 3.72 (s,3H), 3.66 (B of ABX, 0.5H, J=12.0, 5.1), 3.59 (t, 1H, J=9.0), 3.44 (brs, 1H), 3.40-3.30 (m, 2H), 3.15 (m, 1H), 2.84 (m, 1H), 2.19 (m, 2H),2.01 (td, 1H, J=14.8, 2.8), 1.88-1.44 (m, 15H), 1.27 (m, 5H), 1.00 (s,3H), 0.89 (s, 3H); Electrospray ionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculated forC₃₀H₄₈NO₉ 566.7, observed 566.4.

Neoglycoside 4α. Aglycon 3α (34.0 mg, 84.3 μmol) and D-glucose (15.9 mg,88.5 μmol) were dissolved in 3:1 DMF/AcOH (940 μL) and stirred at 60° C.for 48 h. The crude reaction mixture was concentrated, and examined by¹H NMR to reveal a 4α:3α ratio of 37:50 (74% crude yield).

Neoglycoside 4α: (TLC_(Rf)=0.09 in 10% EtOH/CHCl₃) ¹H NMR (CD₃OD, 500MHz) δ 5.90 (br t, 1H, J=1.6), 5.04 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.4, 1.4), 4.92 (Bof ABX, 1H, J=18.4, 1.7), 4.17 (d, 1H, J=8.7), 3.81 (A of ABX, 0.5H,J=12.1, 2.0), 3.70 (s, 3H), 3.66 (B of ABX, 0.5H, J=12.1, 5.2), 3.57 (t,1H, J=8.2), 3.39-3.30 (m, 2H), 3.18 (m, 2H), 2.84 (m, 2H), 2.21 (m, 2H),1.99-1.34 (m, 19H), 1.07 (td, 1H, J=14.0, 3.5), 0.95 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s,3H); Electrospray ionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculated for C₃₀H₄₈NO₉566.7, observed 566.4.

Aglycon 3β Data Collection. X-ray quality crystals of 3β were obtainedvia slow evaporation from chloroform. A colorless crystal withapproximate dimensions 0.41×0.36×0.35 mm³ was selected under oil inambient conditions and attached to the tip of a nylon loop. The crystalwas mounted in a stream of cold nitrogen at 100° K. and manuallycentered in the X-ray beam while visualizing via video camera. Thecrystal evaluation and data collection were performed on a BrukerCCD-1000 diffractometer with Mo Kα (λ=0.71073 Å) radiation and adiffractometer to crystal distance of 4.9 cm. The initial cell constantswere obtained from three series of co scans at different startingangles. Each series consisted of 20 frames collected at intervals of0.3° in a 6° range about ω with the exposure time of 10 sec per frame. Atotal of 54 reflections were obtained. The reflections were successfullyindexed by an automated indexing routine built in the SMART program(S1). The final cell constants were calculated from a set of 6432 strongreflections from the actual data collection. The data were collected byusing the hemisphere data collection routine. The reciprocal space wassurveyed to the extent of a full sphere to a resolution of 0.80 Å. Atotal of 8852 data were harvested by collecting three sets of frameswith 0.25° scans in co with an exposure time 30 sec per frame. Theseredundant datasets were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects.The absorption correction was based on fitting a function to theempirical transmission surface as sampled by multiple equivalentmeasurements.

Aglycon 3β Structure Refinement. The systematic absences in thediffraction data were consistent for the space groups P1⁻ and P1. TheE-statistics were inconclusive and only the non-centrosymmetric spacegroup P1 yielded chemically reasonable and computationally stableresults of refinement (S1). A successful solution by the direct methodsprovided most on hydrogen atoms from the E-map. The remainingnon-hydrogen atoms were located in an alternating series ofleast-squares cycles and difference Fourier maps. All non-hydrogen atomswere refined with anisotropic displacement coefficients. All hydrogenatoms were included in the structure factor calculation at idealizedpositions and were allowed to ride on the neighboring atoms withrelative isotropic displacement coefficients. There are two symmetryindependent molecules of 3β in the asymmetric unit (and incidentally theunit cell) with essentially identical geometries. The absoluteconfiguration could not be unequivocally established from theexperimental data but was assigned from synthesis. There is also onesolvate molecule of water per two molecules of 3β in the unit cell. Thefinal least-squares refinement of 552 parameters against 7847 dataresulted in residuals R (based on F² for 1≧2σ) and wR (based on F² forall data) of 0.0392 and 0.1023, respectively. The final differenceFourier map was featureless. The ORTEP diagrams are drawn with 50%probability ellipsoids.

TABLE 1 Crystal data and structure refinement for 3β Empirical formulaC₂₄H₃₇NO₄•½ H₂O Formula weight 412.55 Temperature 100 (2) K Wavelength0.71073 Å Crystal system Triclinic Space group P1 Unit cell dimensions a= 7.7964 (5) Å α = 95.2600 (10)° b = 7.8330 (5) Å β = 95.5760 (10)° c =17.9391 (13) Å γ = 99.3590 (10)° Volume 1069.37 (12) Å³ Z 2 Density(calculated) 1.281 Mg/m³ Absorption coefficient 0.087 mm⁻¹ F (000) 450Crystal size 0.41 × 0.36 × 0.35 mm³ Theta range for data collection 2.30to 26.39°. Index ranges −9 ≦ h ≦ 9, −9 ≦ k ≦ 9, −22 ≦ l ≦ 22 Reflectionscollected 8852 Independent reflections 7847 [R (int) = 0.0103]Completeness to theta = 98.7% 26.39° Absorption correction Multi-scanwith SADABS Max. and min. transmission 0.9702 and 0.9652 Refinementmethod Full-matrix least-squares on F² Data/restraints/parameters7847/7/552 Goodness-of-fit on F² 1.028 Final R indices [I > 2sigma(l)]R1 = 0.0392, wR2 = 0.1000 R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0412, wR2 = 0.1023Absolute structure parameter N/A - assigned from synthesis Largest diff.peak and hole 0.319 and −0.353 e · Å⁻³

Neoglycoside 4β Data Collection. X-ray quality crystals of 4β wasobtained by dissolving the neoglycoside in EtOH (˜40 mg mL⁻¹) and slowlycrystallizing via vapor diffusion using hexanes. A colorless crystalwith approximate dimensions 0.43×0.31×0.15 mm³ was selected under oil inambient conditions and attached to the tip of a nylon loop. The crystalwas mounted in a stream of cold nitrogen at 100° K. and manuallycentered in the X-ray beam while visualizing via video camera. Thecrystal evaluation and data collection were performed on a BrukerCCD-1000 diffractometer with Mo K_(α) (λ=0.71073 Å) radiation and thediffractometer to crystal distance of 7.36 cm. The initial cellconstants were obtained from three series of ω scans at differentstarting angles. Each series consisted of forty frames collected atintervals of 0.30 in a 6° range about ω with the exposure time offifteen seconds per frame. A total of 149 reflections were obtained. Thereflections were successfully indexed by an automated indexing routinebuilt in the SMART program (S1). The final cell constants werecalculated from a set of 2244 strong reflections from the actual datacollection. The data were collected by using the multi-run datacollection routine. The reciprocal space was surveyed to the extent of afull sphere to a resolution of 0.80 Å. A total of 14014 data wereharvested by collecting six sets of frames with 0.30° scans in ω with anexposure time 14 sec per frame. These highly redundant datasets werecorrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. The absorptioncorrection was based on fitting a function to the empirical transmissionsurface as sampled by multiple equivalent measurements.

Neoglycoside 4β Structure Solution and Refinement. The systematicabsences in the diffraction data were consistent for the space groupsP1⁻ and P1. The E-statistics strongly suggested the centrosymmetricspace group P1 that yielded chemically reasonable and computationallystable results of refinement (S1). A successful solution by the directmethods provided all non-hydrogen atoms from the E-map. All non-hydrogenatoms were refined with anisotropic displacement coefficients. Softrestraints were applied to thermal displacement coefficients of atomC(6′). All hydrogen atoms were included in the structure factorcalculation at idealized positions and were allowed to ride on theneighboring atoms with relative isotropic displacement coefficients. Theabsolute configurations of the chiral atoms were assigned from the knownsynthetic procedure. The crystal proved to be a twin with a 2:1component ratio; the components are related about a 179.8° rotationabout the [1, −1, 0] vector in real space. There are two independentmolecules of the chiral compound and one molecule of solvated ethanol inthe unit cell. The final least-squares refinement of 767 parametersagainst 14014 data resulted in residuals R (based on F² for 1≧2σ) and wR(based on F² for all data) of 0.0639 and 0.1583, respectively.

TABLE 2 Crystal data and structure refinement for 4β. Empirical formulaC₃₀H₄₇NO₉•½CH₃CH₂OH Formula weight 588.72 Temperature 100 (2) KWavelength 0.71073 Å Crystal system Triclinic Space group P1 Unit celldimensions a = 10.1923 (5) Å α = 82.533 (2)° b = 10.2765 (5) Å β =75.932 (2)° c = 16.1912 (8) Å γ = 64.9970 (10)° Volume 1490.15 (13) Å³ Z2 Density (calculated) 1.312 Mg/m³ Absorption coefficient 0.096 mm⁻¹ F(000) 638 Crystal size 0.43 × 0.31 × 0.15 mm³ Theta range for datacollection 2.25 to 26.39°. Index ranges −12 ≦ h ≦ 12, −12 ≦ k ≦ 12, −20≦ l ≦ 20 Reflections collected 14014 Independent reflections 14014 [R(int) = 0.0000] Completeness to theta = 26.39° 92.2% Max. and min.transmission 0.9857 and 0.9598 Refinement method Full-matrixleast-squares on F² Data/restraints/parameters 14017/9/767Goodness-of-fit on F² 0.995 Final R indices [I > 2sigma (l)] R1 =0.0639, wR2 = 0.1470 R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0898, wR2 = 0.1583Absolute structure parameter −0.2 (10) Largest diff. peak and hole 1.187and −0.431 e · Å⁻³

Hydrolytic Stability of 4α. The chemical stability of the neoglycosidiclinkage was examined by monitoring the hydrolytic degradation ofneoglycoside 4α in a 3 mM solution of 1:1 DMSO/buffer. Three bufferswere used, 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5), 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7),and 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 9). Neoglycoside degradation was monitored byreverse phase HPLC on an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 column (4.6×150mm) with a flow rate of 0.8 mL min⁻¹ and a linear gradient of 49%CH₃OH/H₂O to 89% CH₃OH/H₂O over 20 min. At t=0, neoglycoside 4α in 500μL DMSO was added to 500 μL buffer, and the resulting solution wasvortexed for 40 sec, then immediately injected onto the HPLC. Peak areasat 220 nm were used to estimate the neoglycoside/aglycon ratio, which isreported as “percent neoglycoside remaining”[A_(neoglycoside)/(A_(neoglycoside)+A_(aglycon))] for each of the threebuffer systems (see FIG. 4).

Library Synthesis and Purification. Aglycon 3β or 3α (˜40 μmol) wasadded to 4 mL glass vials equipped with stirring fleas. The appropriatesugar (2 eq.) was added to each vial, followed by 3:1 DMF/AcOH (finalconcentration of aglycon=90 mM). The reaction mixtures were stirred at40° C. using a stir plate equipped with a 48-well reaction block and acontact thermometer. After 2 days, the reaction mixtures wereconcentrated via Speed-Vac and suspended in 5% EtOH/CHCl₃. The crudesuspensions were purified in parallel on disposable SiO₂ solid phaseextraction columns using a 24-port vacuum manifold. Library members (βand α) 5-16, 23, 24, 30-36, and 41 were purified on 1000 mg columnseluting first with 5 mL 5% EtOH/CHCl₃ to remove the remaining aglyconand second with 5 mL 15% EtOH/CHCl₃ to collect the productneoglycosides. Library members (β and α) 4, 17-22, 25-29, 37-40, and 42were purified on 500 mg columns eluting first with 4 mL 5% EtOH/CHCl₃ toremove the remaining aglycon and second with 5 mL 25% EtOH/CHCl₃ tocollect the product neoglycosides. The product solutions wereconcentrated via Speed-Vac, weighed, and dissolved in DMSO to make 30 mMor 20 mM stock solutions. The stock solutions were characterized by LCMSusing reverse phase HPLC on an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 column(4.6×150 mm) with a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min and a linear gradient of 45%CH₃OH/H₂O to 85% CH₃OH/H₂O over 20 min and electrospray ionization.Library member purities were estimated by dividing the sum of the peakareas at 220 nm of peaks corresponding to the desired product mass bythe total area of all peaks. For mass information, the purity ofspecific library members, and a tabulation of which members displaygreater than 90% of a single product isomer as judged by LCMS, see Table3, below. Average library purity was 91%.

TABLE 3 LCMS information for neoglycoside library 90% 90% CalculatedObserved Percent Isomeric Calculated Observed Percent IsomericNeoglycoside Mass Mass Purity Purity Neoglycoside Mass Mass PurityPurity  4β 566.7 566.7 97 +  4α 566.7 566.7 98 +  5β 536.6 536.6 98 − 5α 536.6 536.6 100 −  6β 536.6 536.6 99 −  6α 536.6 536.6 99 +  7β550.7 550.7 97 +  7α 550.7 550.7 96 −  8β 550.7 550.7 100 +  8α 550.7550.7 99 −  9β 550.7 550.7 21 −  9α 550.7 550.7 0 − 10β 550.7 550.7 100− 10α 550.7 550.7 97 − 11β 548.7 548.7 100 + 11α 548.7 548.7 100 + 12β568.6 568.6 88 − 12α 568.6 568.6 95 + 13β 568.6 568.6 100 + 13α 568.6568.6 100 + 14β 536.6 536.6 97 + 14α 536.6 536.6 99 + 15β 536.6 536.695 + 15α 536.6 536.6 99 + 16β 568.5 568.5 91 − 16α 568.5 568.5 99 − 17β566.7 566.7 100 − 17α 566.7 566.7 95 − 18β 566.7 566.7 98 + 18α 566.7566.7 98 + 19β 566.7 566.7 65 − 19α 566.7 566.7 94 − 20β 566.7 566.7 88− 20α 566.7 566.7 91 − 21β 566.7 566.7 96 − 21α 566.7 566.7 91 − 22β566.7 566.7 93 − 22α 566.7 566.7 92 − 23β 536.6 536.6 99 + 23α 536.6536.6 100 + 24β 536.6 536.6 99 + 24α 536.6 536.6 97 + 25β 566.7 566.789 + 25α 566.7 566.7 93 + 26β 566.7 566.7 90 − 26α 566.7 566.7 91 − 27β566.7 566.7 88 − 27α 566.7 566.7 91 − 28β 566.7 566.7 52 − 28α 566.7566.7 61 − 29β 566.7 566.7 61 − 29α 566.7 566.7 34 − 30β 548.7 548.798 + 30α 548.7 548.7 97 + 31β 578.7 578.7 62 − 31α 578.7 578.7 86 − 32β536.6 536.6 96 + 32α 536.6 536.6 98 − 33β 354.6 354.6 98 + 33α 354.6354.6 99 − 34β 607.7 607.7 97 − 34α 607.7 607.7 99 − 35β 728.8 728.892 + 35α 728.8 728.8 88 + 36β 728.8 728.8 64 + 36α 728.8 728.8 89 + 37β728.8 728.8 96 + 37α 728.8 728.8 97 + 38β 580.7 580.7 70 − 38α 580.7580.7 22 − 39β 566.7 566.7 89 + 39α 566.7 566.7 96 + 40β 566.7 566.796 + 40α 566.7 566.7 97 + 41β 562.7 562.7 87 − 41α 562.7 562.7 83 − 42β566.7 566.7 89 + 42α 566.7 566.7 98 +

Cell Culture: All cell lines except NmuMG were maintained in RPMI 1640medium from InVitrogen (Cat No. 11875-085) supplemented with 10% w/vfetal bovine serum (FBS) from ICN (Cat No. 2916154) andpenicillin-streptomycin (PS) (100 U/mL and 100 μg/mL) from InVitrogen(Cat No. 15140-122). NmuMG cells were maintained in DMEM medium fromInVitrogen (Cat No. 11965-084) supplemented with 10% w/v fetal bovineserum (FBS) from ICN (Cat No. 2916154), 10 μg/ml insulin (InVitrogen CatNo 12585-014), and penicillin-streptomycin (PS) (100 U/mL and 100 μg/mL)from InVitrogen (Cat No. 15140-122). Cells were harvested bytrypsinization using 0.25% w/v trypsin and 0.1% w/v EDTA from InVitrogen(Cat No. 15-050-057) and then counted in a hemocytometer in duplicatewith better than 10% agreement in field counts. Cells were plated at acell density of 10,000-15,000 cells/well of each Corning Costar 96-wellblack tissue culture treated microtiter plate (Fisher Cat No.07-200-627). Cells were grown for 1 h at 37° C., with 5% CO₂ in ahumidified incubator to allow cell attachment to occur before compoundaddition.

Library Member Handling and Preparation for Cytotoxicity Assays: Librarymembers were stored at −20° C. under dessicating conditions before theassay. Library member stocks (100×) were prepared in Corning Costarpolypropylene 96-well V-bottom polypropylene microtiter plates (FisherCat No. 07-200-695). Five serial 1:2 dilutions were made with anhydrousDMSO at 100× the final concentration used in the assay.

Library Member Addition: The library member-containing plates werediluted 1:10 with complete cell culture media. The 10× stocks (10 μL)were added to the attached cells using a Biomek FX liquid handler(Beckman-Coulter). Library member stocks (10 μL) were added to 90 μL ofcells in each plate to insure full mixing of stocks with culture mediausing a Beckman FX liquid handler with 96-well head.

Determination of Cytotoxicity: Cells were incubated with the librarymembers for 72 h before fluorescence reading. Test plates were removedfrom the incubator and washed 1× in sterile PBS to remove serumcontaining calcium esterases. Calcein AM reagent (30 μL, 1 M) was addedand the cells were incubated for 30 min at 37° C. Plates were read foremission using a fluorescein filter (excitation 485 nm, emission 535nm).

IC₅₀ Calculation: For each library member, at least six dose responseexperiments were conducted. Within each experiment, percent inhibitionvalues at each concentration were expressed as a percentage of themaximum fluorescence emission signal observed for a 0 nM control. Tocalculate IC₅₀, percent inhibitions were plotted as a function of log[concentration] and then fit to a four-parameter logistic model thatallowed for a variable Hill slope using XL_(fit) 4.1.

Cytotoxicity Assays. All cell lines except NmuMG were maintained in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% w/v fetal bovine serum (FBS) andpenicillin-streptomycin (PS) (100 U/mL and 100 μg/mL). NmuMG cells weremaintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% w/v fetal bovine serum(FBS), 10 μg/ml insulin, and penicillin-streptomycin (PS) (100 U/mL and100 μg/mL). Cells were harvested by trypsinization using 0.25% w/vtrypsin and 0.1% w/v EDTA and then counted in a hemocytometer induplicate with better than 10% agreement in field counts. Cells wereplated at a cell density of 10,000-15,000 cells/well of each 96-wellblack tissue culture treated microtiter plate. Cells were grown for 1 hat 37° C., with 5% CO₂ in a humidified incubator to allow cellattachment to occur before compound addition. Library members werestored at −20° C. under dessicating conditions before the assay. Librarymember stocks (100×) were prepared in polypropylene 96-well V-bottompolypropylene microtiter plates. Five serial 1:2 dilutions were madewith anhydrous DMSO at 100× the final concentration used in the assay.The library member-containing plates were diluted 1:10 with completecell culture media. The 10× stocks (10 μL) were added to the attachedcells using a Biomek FX liquid handler. Library member stocks (10 μL)were added to 90 μL of cells in each plate to insure full mixing ofstocks with culture media using a Beckman FX liquid handler with 96-wellhead. Cells were incubated with the library members for 72 h beforefluorescence reading. Test plates were removed from the incubator andwashed 1× in sterile PBS to remove serum containing calcium esterases.Calcein AM reagent (30 μL, 1 M) was added and the cells were incubatedfor 30 min at 37° C. Plates were read for emission using a fluoresceinfilter (excitation 485 nm, emission 535 nm).

IC₅₀ Calculations. For each library member, at least six dose responseexperiments were conducted. Within each experiment, percent inhibitionvalues at each concentration were expressed as a percentage of themaximum fluorescence emission signal observed for a 0 nM control. Tocalculate IC₅₀, percent inhibitions were plotted as a function of log[concentration] and then fit to a four-parameter logistic model thatallowed for a variable Hill slope using XLfit 4.1.

Na/K-ATPase Assays. Inhibition of Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase on HEK-293 cells andCHO-K1 cells by the library hits was determined by Aurora Biomed, Inc.using a high-throughput non-radioactive rubidium ion uptake assay.Experiments were conducted in duplicate using three differentconcentrations. Within each experiment, percent inhibition values at thethree concentrations were expressed as the percent reduction of themaximum absorption signal observed for a 0 nM control. IC₅₀ values weredetermined using the following formula: IC₅₀=[(50−low %)/(high %−low%)]×(high conc.−low conc.)+low conc.

As highlighted in FIG. 3, the requisite methoxyamine functional groupwas installed at the C(3) of digitoxin (the natural position of sugarattachment) in three simple chemical steps. Specifically, digitoxin wasoxidized under acidic conditions to simultaneously hydrolyze theO-glycoside and provide digitoxigenone which was then converted to thecorresponding set of oxime diastereomers (2a,b). Treatment of 2a,b withtert-butylamine borane resulted in a 1:1 mixture of stereoisomers whichwere easily resolved via standard column chromatography and assigned as3β and 3α via X-ray crystallography. The accessibility of bothdigitoxigenin-like isomers 3β and 3α set the stage to explore theimportance of the C(3) stereochemistry on biological activity. Pilotreactions of aglycons 3β and 3α with D-glucose were first explored in anattempt to generate the corresponding neoglycosides (FIG. 2B). Aglycons3β and 3α reacted with D-glucose in DMF/acetic acid to formneoglycosides 4β and 4α in good yields (>70%). Both reactions proceededstereoselectively, providing the β-anomer exclusively as determined by¹H NMR. An X-ray crystal structure of neoglycoside 4β was obtained (FIG.3A) and compared to the crystal structures of related O-glycosidesavailable from the Cambridge Crystal Database (FIG. 3B-FIG. 3D). Theobserved orientations about the C(2)-C(3)-N(3)-C(1′) torsion (FIG. 3C)and the C(3)-N(3)-C(1′)—C(2′) torsion in the neoglycoside structure(FIG. 3D) fall on the periphery of the narrow range of orientationsdisplayed in the solid state structures of 23 known cardiacO-glycosides.

A library of 78 digitoxin derivatives was synthesized in parallel from39 reducing sugars and aglycons 3β and 3α. The reaction mixtures werestirred for two days at 40° C., concentrated, and then submitted tosolid phase extraction in parallel to remove unreacted aglycon andsugar. The concentrated products were characterized by LCMS to assesspurity and to confirm product identity. Even though a diverse array ofreducing sugars were used—including L-sugars, deoxy sugars, dideoxysugars, disaccharides, and uronic acids—in every case neoglycosides weresuccessfully generated. The average purity of the library members was91%, and the LC chromatograms suggested that ˜50% of the library memberscontained greater than 90% of a single product isomer. Whilecombinatorial methods have been extensively applied to steroidalderivatives and cardenolides in particular (26, 27), the resultsreported herein represent the largest and most diverse glycorandomizedlibrary generated to date.

The chemical stability of the neoglycosidic linkage was examined bymonitoring the hydrolytic degradation of neoglycoside 4α in a 3 mMsolution of 1:1 DMSO/buffer using buffers at three different pHs.Compound 4α was completely stable over the period of one month underneutral or basic conditions but slowly hydrolyzed under acidicconditions over this same time period. Using identical acidicconditions, aglycon 3α and D-glucose did not react to form neoglycoside4α, ruling out equilibrium as a complicating factor in this analysis.Library member 27β, derived from aglycon 3β, also displayed nohydrolytic degradation under the same conditions at neutral and basicpHs, demonstrating that aglycon C(3) stereochemistry does notsignificantly influence neoglycoside stability. In conjunction with theneoglycoside structural analyses and the previously reported NMR andmolecular dynamics studies, these hydrolytic studies suggest theneoglycoside nitrogen to be predominately charge-neutral atphysiological pH.

Cytotoxicity. The activity of the library members was assessed using ahigh-throughput cytotoxicity assay on nine human cancer cell linesrepresenting a broad range of carcinomas including breast, colon, CNS,liver, lung, and ovary, and a mouse mammary normal epithelial controlline. The cytotoxicities of digitoxin and aglycons 3β and 3α were alsoexamined. Digitoxin was a modest cytotoxin toward the nine human cancercell lines (average IC₅₀˜440 nM) but was non-specific since it affectedthese cancer cells with similar potency. One library member (33 μl)closely mimicked this activity. Several hits identified from theneoglycoside library exhibited enhanced activities relative to theparent natural product digitoxin (1), both in terms of potency andspecificity.

The two most significant hits, library members 5β and 27β, displayedstriking potency and excellent selectivity, respectively. Specifically,library member 5β was a potent cytotoxin against six cancer cell lines(18±2 nM in the case of HCT-116, greater than nine-fold more potent thandigitoxin), and also was modestly selective since three out of the ninecancer cell lines tested were much less affected.

In contrast, library member 27β was a less potent cytotoxin than 5β but27β exhibited dramatic selectivity since it was four times morecytotoxic toward NCI/ADR-RES cells (IC₅₀=100±10 nM) than any other cellline. This result is especially significant since NCI/ADR-RES is amulti-drug resistant line that contains high levels of MDR-1 andP-glycoprotein expression (Fairchild, C. R. et al., Cancer Res. (1987)47, 5141-5148; Scudiero, D. A. et al., J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (1998) 90,862). Given that cardiac glycosides are substrates for P-glycoprotein(Tanigawara, Y. et al., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. (1992) 263, 840-845),such tumor specificity suggests 27β may no longer serve as aP-glycoprotein substrate or may be interacting with a unique target.

Other neoglycoside library members, while not as potent as 5β or asselective as 27β, also were significantly active. For example, librarymember 40β exhibited notable selectivity, with modest cytotoxicitytoward only Dul45 and Hep3B cells (IC₅₀=200 nM±30 and 180 nM±30,respectively) while library members 15 μl and 23β were significantlymore potent than digitoxin against some cell lines, but were somewhatnon-selective like digitoxin.

TABLE 4 Cancer Cell Cytoxicity-Library member IC₅₀ values (μM) andstandard errors. 2-deoxy- 6-deoxy- 3-deoxy- 6-deoxy- 2-fluoro- 6-fluoro-L- D- L- D- 2-deoxy-D- D- D- D- D- riboside riboside fucoside fucosidegalactoside glucoside glucoside glucoside glucoside Sugar Name (5β) (6β)(7β) (8β) (9β) (10β) (11β) (12β) (13β) Du145 IC50 0.30 0.72 0.7 3.9 70.8 6 9 5 Std Err 0.03 0.04 0.1 0.6 1 0.2 1 2 2 MCF7 IC50 0.19 3.0 1.311 5.1 0.46 1.9 8 6.2 Std Err 0.03 0.4 0.4 2 0.8 0.09 0.2 1 0.9 HCT-116IC50 0.018 1.3 1.2 7 10 1.8 2.3 8 4.8 Std Err 0.002 0.6 0.3 1 1 0.4 0.42 0.8 Hep 3B IC50 0.059 0.9 0.35 4.9 3.6 1.7 4.4 8 4.6 Std Err 0.006 0.10.04 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.4 1 1.0 SF-268 IC50 0.23 1.8 0.90 10 8 0.77 2.5 7 4.7Std Err 0.02 0.2 0.23 1 1 0.09 0.6 1 0.7 SK-OV-3 IC50 0.045 1.7 0.5 5 42.5 4 9 3.4 Std Err 0.006 0.3 0.1 1 1 0.3 1 2 1.0 NCI-H460 IC50 0.0530.90 0.6 1.3 2.0 1.6 1.0 2.9 1.4 Std Err 0.009 0.05 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.10.4 0.2 A549 IC50 0.033 1.02 0.30 1.8 1.3 1.60 1.2 3.7 2.0 Std Err 0.0040.03 0.03 0.2 0.2 0.07 0.1 0.3 0.2 NCI/ADR-RES IC50 0.032 0.66 0.25 1.50.9 0.44 0.95 2.6 1.1 Std Err 0.002 0.04 0.04 0.2 0.2 0.04 0.10 0.4 0.2NmuMG IC50 0.031 0.48 >25 >25 >25 0.94 >25 >25 >25 Std Err 0.007 0.090.08 Du145 IC50 0.30 0.72 0.7 3.9 7 0.8 6 9 5 Std Err 0.03 0.04 0.1 0.61 0.2 1 2 2 MCF7 IC50 0.19 3.0 1.3 11 5.1 0.46 1.9 8 6.2 Std Err 0.030.4 0.4 2 0.8 0.09 0.2 1 0.9 HCT-116 IC50 0.018 1.3 1.2 7 10 1.8 2.3 84.8 Std Err 0.002 0.6 0.3 1 1 0.4 0.4 2 0.8 Hep 3B IC50 0.059 0.9 0.354.9 3.6 1.7 4.4 8 4.6 Std Err 0.006 0.1 0.04 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.4 1 1.0SF-268 IC50 0.23 1.8 0.90 10 8 0.77 2.5 7 4.7 Std Err 0.02 0.2 0.23 1 10.09 0.6 1 0.7 SK-OV-3 IC50 0.045 1.7 0.5 5 4 2.5 4 9 3.4 Std Err 0.0060.3 0.1 1 1 0.3 1 2 1.0 NCI-H460 IC50 0.053 0.90 0.6 1.3 2.0 1.6 1.0 2.91.4 Std Err 0.009 0.05 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 A549 IC50 0.033 1.020.30 1.8 1.3 1.60 1.2 3.7 2.0 Std Err 0.004 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.2 0.07 0.10.3 0.2 NCI/ADR-RES IC50 0.032 0.66 0.25 1.5 0.9 0.44 0.95 2.6 1.1 StdErr 0.002 0.04 0.04 0.2 0.2 0.04 0.10 0.4 0.2 NmuMG IC50 0.0310.48 >25 >25 >25 0.94 >25 >25 >25 Std Err 0.007 0.09 0.08 L- D- L- L- D-L- D- L- D- lyxoside lyxoside rhamnoside alloside alloside altrosidealtroside galactoside galactoside Sugar Name (14β) (15β) (16β) (17β)(18β) (19β) (20β) (21β) (22β) Du145 IC50 2.4 0.07 0.17 0.79 2.2 2.1 1.22.1 1.5 Std Err 0.5 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 MCF7 IC50 4.50.23 1.8 0.9 6.8 1.3 1.5 1.8 3.0 Std Err 0.9 0.02 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.20.3 0.4 HCT-116 IC50 8 0.17 0.9 0.5 6 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.8 Std Err 2 0.03 0.30.2 1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 Hep 3B IC50 0.6 0.09 0.54 0.8 3.3 2.0 0.35 1.3 0.6Std Err 0.1 0.01 0.07 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.04 0.2 0.3 SF-268 IC50 1.1 0.09 3.30.4 3.5 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.2 Std Err 0.4 0.01 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2SK-OV-3 IC50 4.2 0.16 4 0.7 6.4 1.0 1.1 1.6 1.5 Std Err 0.8 0.08 1 0.11.0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 NCI-H460 IC50 5 0.09 0.33 0.69 3.2 1.6 0.62 2.6 1.6Std Err 1 0.01 0.05 0.09 0.2 0.2 0.09 0.2 0.2 A549 IC50 0.70 0.14 0.70.24 2.0 0.76 0.54 0.9 0.97 Std Err 0.06 0.02 0.1 0.02 0.2 0.09 0.04 0.20.09 NCI/ADR-RES IC50 0.73 0.075 0.35 0.16 0.8 0.41 0.9 1.6 0.8 Std Err0.04 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.2 0.05 0.1 0.5 0.1 NmuMG IC50 0.9 0.069 >25 0.333.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.5 Std Err 0.1 0.005 0.04 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 L- D- D-L- D- L- D- L- 6-keto-D- xyloside xyloside guloside mannoside mannosideidoside idoside mycaroside galactoside Sugar Name (23β) (24β) (25β)(26β) (27β) (28β) (29β) (30β) (31β) Du145 IC50 0.62 0.82 5.7 2.0 1.3 1.91.3 1.1 1.5 Std Err 0.07 0.06 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 MCF7 IC50 0.231.8 0.9 3.0 1.7 2.6 0.44 1.8 9 Std Err 0.02 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.07 0.32 HCT-116 IC50 0.10 1.8 2.1 4.2 0.8 3.2 2.3 0.6 3.1 Std Err 0.03 0.3 0.40.7 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.8 Hep 3B IC50 0.50 1.2 1.9 2.0 0.4 1.0 0.3 0.6 3.1Std Err 0.08 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 SF-268 IC50 0.49 2.1 2.02.1 2.2 2.1 1.3 1.1 8 Std Err 0.09 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 3 SK-OV-3IC50 0.22 1.8 2.2 3.1 0.8 2.4 1.5 1.1 2.9 Std Err 0.04 0.4 1.0 0.8 0.20.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 NCI-H460 IC50 0.08 1.8 2.6 1.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 0.19 2.4 StdErr 0.02 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.02 0.6 A549 IC50 0.079 1.1 2.0 1.70.63 1.14 0.37 0.6 2.3 Std Err 0.005 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.07 0.08 0.02 0.1 0.9NCI/ADR-RES IC50 0.138 0.54 1.1 4.8 0.10 0.61 1.5 0.35 1.0 Std Err 0.0090.04 0.3 0.5 0.01 0.06 0.4 0.03 0.1 NmuMG IC50 0.057 0.9 1.8 1.3 1.01.8 >25 >25 >25 Std Err 0.007 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.5 L- D- N-acetyl-D- D-L- arabinoside arabinoside galactosaminoside melibioside lactosidemaltoside galacturonoside taloside Sugar Name (32β) (33β) (34β) (35β)(36β) (37β) (38β) (39β) Du145 IC50 1.1 0.17 >25 27 13 4.4 1.9 0.76 StdErr 0.3 0.03 4 3 1.0 0.4 0.07 MCF7 IC50 2.2 0.30 >25 >25 >25 >25 5 1.8Std Err 0.3 0.04 2 0.3 HCT-116 IC50 0.3 0.36 >25 >25 >25 24 2.7 2.3 StdErr 0.1 0.07 6 0.6 0.4 Hep 3B IC50 1.2 0.26 17 26 26 7 2.1 0.96 Std Err0.1 0.04 2 6 4 2 0.3 0.07 SF-268 IC50 1.0 0.16 >25 >25 >25 6 2.2 1.4 StdErr 0.3 0.03 1 0.7 0.2 SK-OV-3 IC50 3.0 0.47 17 15 19 5 3.1 1.5 Std Err0.5 0.09 4 2 4 1 0.9 0.5 NCI-H460 IC50 0.72 0.33 20 29 >25 6.1 1.4 1.1Std Err 0.07 0.04 2 8 0.9 0.2 0.1 A549 IC50 1.7 0.34 >25 >25 24 4.4 2.20.89 Std Err 0.3 0.05 4 0.2 0.2 0.07 NCI/ IC50 0.65 0.124 6.4 16 13 4.41.6 1.0 ADR- Std Err 0.05 0.007 0.5 1 2 0.4 0.1 0.3 RES NmuMG IC50 0.40.12 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 0.5 Std Err 0.1 0.02 0.2 6-deoxy-6- D- azido-D-L- D- O-D- R-C(3) S-C(3) taloside mannoside glucoside glucosideglucoside aglycon aglycon digitoxin Sugar Name (40β) (41β) (42β) (4β)(43β) (3β) (3α) (1) Du145 IC50 0.20 2.0 1.3 8.2 0.22 1.3 2.9 0.26 StdErr 0.03 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.04 0.3 0.9 0.03 MCF7 IC50 1.4 3.3 0.6 10 0.7 1.813 0.32 Std Err 0.3 0.6 0.3 1 0.1 0.3 2 0.03 HCT-116 IC50 1.9 6 0.9 3.80.6 1.2 9 0.17 Std Err 0.2 1 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.2 2 0.04 Hep 3B IC50 0.18 1.80.9 2.4 0.21 1.4 3.5 0.22 Std Err 0.03 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.03 0.1 0.3 0.01SF-268 IC50 1.3 2.5 1.9 4.5 0.22 1.0 3.5 1.5 Std Err 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.80.08 0.2 0.5 0.2 SK-OV-3 IC50 0.49 2.1 1.0 6 0.40 0.9 3 0.7 Std Err 0.090.3 0.4 1 0.08 0.2 1 0.1 NCI-H460 IC50 0.80 2.7 1.3 3.5 0.39 0.7 2.40.28 Std Err 0.06 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.03 A549 IC50 0.41 1.7 0.82.9 0.29 1.2 8.3 0.28 Std Err 0.03 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.02 0.1 0.5 0.04NCI/ADR-RES IC50 1.9 0.84 0.55 1.9 0.19 0.71 5.1 0.22 Std Err 0.5 0.090.05 0.5 0.02 0.05 0.6 0.03 NmuMG IC50 0.48 >25 1.2 3.1 >25 >25 >25 >25Std Err 0.06 0.1 0.2 2-deoxy- 6-deoxy- 3-deoxy- 6-deoxy- 2-fluoro-6-fluoro- L- D- L- D- 2-deoxy-D- D- D- D- D- riboside riboside fucosidefucoside galactoside glucoside glucoside glucoside glucoside Sugar Name(5α) (6α) (7α) (8α) (9α) (10α) (11α) (12α) (13α) Du145IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err MCF7IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err HCT-116IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err Hep 3BIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SF-268IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SK-OV-3IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NCI-H460IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err A549IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NCI/ADR-RESIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NmuMGIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err L- D- L- L- D- L- D- L-D- lyxoside lyxoside rhamnoside alloside alloside altroside altrosidegalactoside galactoside Sugar Name (14α) (15α) (16α) (17α) (18α) (19α)(20α) (21α) (22α) Du145 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std ErrMCF7 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err HCT-116IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err Hep 3BIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SF-268IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SK-OV-3IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NCI-H460IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err A549IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NCI/ADR-RESIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NmuMGIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err L- D- D- L- D- L- D- L-6-keto-D- xyloside xyloside guloside mannoside mannoside idoside idosidemycaroside galactoside Sugar Name (23α) (24α) (25α) (26α) (27α) (28α)(29α) (30α) (31α) Du145 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std ErrMCF7 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err HCT-116IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err Hep 3BIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SF-268IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SK-OV-3IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NCI-H460IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err A549IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NCI/ADR-RESIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NmuMGIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err L- D- N-acetyl-D- D- L-arabinoside arabinoside galactosaminoside melibioside lactosidemaltoside galacturonoside taloside Sugar Name (32α) (33α) (34α) (35α)(36α) (37α) (38α) (39α) Du145 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 StdErr MCF7 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err HCT-116IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err Hep 3BIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SF-268IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SK-OV-3IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NCI-H460IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err A549IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NCI/IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 ADR- Std Err RES NmuMGIC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err 6-deoxy-6- D- azido-D- L-D- taloside mannoside glucoside glucoside Sugar Name (40α) (41α) (42α)(4α) Du145 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err MCF7 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 StdErr HCT-116 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err Hep 3B IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 StdErr SF-268 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err SK-OV-3 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 StdErr NCI-H460 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err A549 IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 StdErr NCI/ADR-RES IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25 Std Err NmuMG IC50 >25 >25 >25 >25Std Err

The library members showed stereospecificity in the cytotoxic actions.In contrast to the 3β-derived analogs, the 38 neoglycosides derived fromaglycon 3α uniformly displayed low cytotoxicities in the assay (IC₅₀>25μM), as did aglycon 3α itself, establishing the importance of thenatural β configuration of the C(3) stereocenter. Aglycon 3β was onlyweakly cytotoxic against the cell lines (average IC₅₀˜1.10 μM),consistent with the influence sugars have upon library membercytotoxicity. Interestingly, the six hits described above all containsugars with a common structural feature, an S-configured C(2′) sugarstereocenter. This C(2′) stereochemistry appears to be of criticalimportance for compound activity. For example, the C(2′) epimer of theextremely potent library member 5β (L-arabinose-containing member 32β)was relatively inactive toward the ten cell lines examined. Likewise,D-glucose-containing library member 4β was relatively inactive anddisplayed none of the cell line specificity observed for its C(2′)epimer 27β.

Neoglycosides with sugars containing reactive handles were successfullygenerated. For example, while not active under these assay conditions,41β contains the C(2′) stereochemistry shared by the library hits and areactive azido group which is amenable to further diversification viaHuisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition (Fu, X. et al., Nat. Biotechnol.(2003) 21, 1467-1469). Such library members can this serve as thestarting point for the development of compounds with enhancedcytotoxicity.

To assess how these structural modifications impact the ability oflibrary members to inhibit Na⁺/K⁺-ATPases, a fundamental activity ofcardiac glycosides (Paula, S., et al., (2005) Biochemistry 44, 498-510),library hits 5β, 15β, 23β, 27β, 33β, 40β, and digitoxin (1) weresubmitted to a non-radioactive rubidium uptake assay to gaugeNa⁺/K⁺-ATPase inhibition in both HEK-239 human embryonic kidney cellsand CHO-K1 hamster ovary cells (Gill, S. et al., (2004) ASSAY and DrugDevelopment Technologies 2, 535-542). In HEK-239 cells, digitoxindisplayed an IC₅₀ of 75.4±0.5 μM, while none of the library hits showed50% inhibition even at the highest concentration tested (300 μM for 5β,15β, 23β, and 33β; 200 μM for 27β and 40β). A similar trend was observedin the CHO-K1 cells. Thus, hits identified from the neoglycoside librarynot only displayed enhanced cytotoxic properties toward human cancercells, but the rubidium uptake assays reveal these six neoglycosides tobe less potent Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase inhibitors in a human cell line thandigitoxin.

TABLE 5 Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase Inhibition IC₅₀ values (μM) and standarddeviations. L- D- L- D- D- D- Library digitoxin riboside lyxosidexyloside mannoside arabinoside taloside Member (1) (5β) (15β) (23β)(27β) (33β) (40β) HEK-298 IC50 75.4 >300 >300 >300 >200 >300 >200 StdDev 0.5 CHO-K1 IC50 77 270 200 >500 >300 170 180 Std Dev 2 20 10 50 30

The growing body of epidemiological (Johnson, P. H. et al., MolecularCancer Therapeutics (2002) 1, 1293-1304), in vitro (Johansson, S. etal., Anti-Cancer Drugs (2001) 12, 475-483) and in vivo (Svensson, A. etal., Anticancer Res. (2005) 25, 207-212) evidence supporting theanti-cancer benefits of cardinolides has prompted the search fornon-cardioactive analogs which still retain anticancer activity. Thespecific mechanism of cardenolide-induced cytotoxicity remainscontroversial. For example, a preferred ligand for cardenolides, theNa⁺/K⁺-ATPase, belongs to the ‘Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase signalosome’ the activationof which by certain cardenolides can lead to NF-κB pathway inactivation(Dmitrieva, R. I. et al. Exp. Biol. Med. (2002) 227, 561-569).Constitutive activation of the NF-κB pathway protects a large group ofcancer cells against apoptosis while suppression of this transcriptionfactor can restore normal levels of apoptosis in cancer cells and alsopotentially block tumorigenesis and inflammation (Quanquebeke E. V. etal. J. Med. Chem. (2005) 48, 849-856; Sreenivasan, Y. et al., Biochem.Pharmacol. (2003) 66, 2223-2239). Yet, digitoxin-mediated inhibition ofthe NF-κB signaling pathway in CF lung epithelial cells has beendemonstrated to be mechanistically distinct from Na⁺/K⁺-ATPaseinhibition (Srivastava, M. et. al., (2004)). With respect to otherimplicated cellular players, the same nonlethal cardenolideconcentrations that inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation alsoactivates Src kinase, stimulates the interaction between Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase,the activated Src kinase and epidermal growth factor (EGFR), and leadsto the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2(ERK1/2) and subsequent cell cycle arrest caused by increased levels ofp21^(Cip1) (Kometiani, P. et al., Mol. Pharmacol. (2005) 67, 929-936).Cardiac glycosides have also been demonstrated to initiate apoptosis viathe classical caspase-dependent pathways in malignant T lymphoblasts(Daniel, D. et al., Internatl. Immunopharmacol. (2003) 3, 1791-1801) andprostrate cancer cells (Lin, H. et al., J. Biol. Chem. (2004) 279,29302-29307) and, in the latter, also inhibit testosterone production invivo (Lin, H. et al. Br. J. Pharmacol. (1998) 125, 1635-1640). Thus,while the cytotoxicity of certain cardiac glycosides may correlate withNa⁺/K⁺-ATPase inhibition, the present study reveals a new class ofdesirable non-cardioactive tumor-specific and potent cytotoxins, themechanism of which remains to be elucidated.

The neoglycorandomization of digitoxin illustrates the remarkable easeby which the influence a sugar has on a natural product scaffold can bequickly scanned via this simple, mild, and robust reaction withunprotected and non-activated reducing sugars. In this prototypeexample, it is clear that subtle sugar modifications can dramatically,and independently, modulate both the cytotoxic properties and theNa⁺/K⁺-ATPase inhibitory properties of cardiac glycosides. The potentialof neoglycorandomization is further augmented by its compatibility withchemical handles (e.g., azido groups) for additional elaboration.Neoglycorandomization is solely limited by the efficiency andspecificity of alkoxyamine handle installation and the availability ofreducing sugar donors; thus, these studies highlight the uniquepotential of neoglycosylation and/or neoglycorandomization as auniversally powerful tool for glycobiology and drug discovery. Moreover,a wide Tange of reducing sugars are available commercially or viaelegant transformations from simple precursors, presenting broad accessto the only building blocks essential to this approach.

The versatility of the present invention is further demonstrated bymodifying glycosidic linkage in digitoxin analogs for tumor selectivecytotoxins. Scheme 7 illustrates neoglycosylation, the afore-mentionedchemoselective reaction between secondary oxyamines and unprotected,unactivated reducing sugars to form stable “neoglycosides.” Peri, F. etal., Tetrahedron (1998) 54, 12269-12278.

Scheme 7

The method of the present invention provides broad access to a widerange of oxyamines for synthesizing a variety of neoglycosides. In thisscheme, the inventor used commercially available salt, HONH₂*HCl, andtreated it with Boc₂O to generate HONHBoc (see Cardilo, G. et al.,Tetrahedron (1998) 54, 8217-8222). Under basic conditions, HONHBoc wastreated with primary or secondary alkyl halides to form protectedoxiamines (RONHBoc) (based on Weinstock, L. T. and C. C. Cheng, J. Med.Chem. (1979) 22, 594-597). These oximanines were deprotectedquantitatively using 4M HCl in dioxane to provide the primary oxyaminesemployed to synthesize the alglycons used in the neoglycosylation schemeshown below:

This method has provided glycopeptide mimics, (Carrasco, M. R. et al.,Biopolymers (2006) 84, 414-420; Carrasco, M. R. et al., J. Org. Chem.,(2003) 68, 8853-8858; Carrasco, M. R. et al., J. Org. Chem., (2003) 68,195-197; Carrasco, M. R. et al., Tetrahedron Lett., (2002) 43,5727-5729) oligosaccharide mimics, (Peri, F. et al., Chem. Comm. (2004)623-627; Peri, F. et al., Chem. Eur. J. (2004) 10, 1433-1444) and largelibraries of natural product MeON-neoglycosides including potentdigitoxin-based cytotoxins (e.g., 3a, IC₅₀₌₁₈-59 nM) (described herein;Langenhan, J. M. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2005) 102,12305-12310). Since digitoxin neoglycosides containing a non-naturalMeON-linkage displayed strong cytotoxicity, the inventor suspectedtuning the structure of such glycosidic linkages would modulateglycoconjugate activities. Testing this hypothesis required thedevelopment of oxyamine neoglycosylation to provide other RON-linkages.

To determine if neoglycosides with alternative linkages can be generatedeasily, aglycons 2 were synthesized from digitoxin in three simple stepsand incubated in parallel with L-ribose and L-xylose, deoxysugars thatpreviously produced cytotoxic digitoxin neoglycosides (Langenhan, J. M.et al., J. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2005) 102, 12305-12310.)

Some of the syntheses and data reported below were previously reportedin Langenhan, J. M. et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. (2008) 18, 670-673,which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for allpurposes. Under the optimized reaction conditions indicated in Scheme 7,all digitoxin aglycons containing non-methyl O-alkyl groups except for2d (R=tBu) were compatible with oxyamine neoglycosylation, leading to apanel of eighteeen digitoxin analogs (3a-c,e-j and 4a-c,e-j) containingdifferent RON-glycosidic linkages. The panel was purified in parallelvia solid phase extraction on silica gel cartridges to remove unreactedaglycon and sugar, and LCMS was used to confirm product identity andassess product purity. Similar to previous results with MeON-glycosides,the average purity of the panel of neoglycosides was 87%, and all butone compound (3b) contained greater than 90% of a single product isomer.The isolated yields for these reactions ranged from 7 to 61% (average30%). Therefore, this represents the first panel of natural productsthat contain diversified neoglycosidic linkages.

Regarding the use of tert-butyl oxyamines (2d), for molecules with“secondary” sites of nitrogen attachment, like digitoxin (carbon a tonitrogen is attached to two carbons and one proton), the reactions donot work when the R portion of the NOR group is doubly branched alpha tooxygen (e.g., t-Bu), and the failure of t-Bu in the digitoxin contextwas expected. In contrast, previously performed model reactions showedthat all oxyamines tried work on systems that contain a “primary” siteof nitrogen attachment (carbon a to nitrogen is attached to one carbonand two protons). The model reactions and the resulting LC/MS-confirmeddata for % conversion are shown below.

Effect of Aglycon Structure on Percent Conversion of Glycosylation

entry R R₁ R₂ Conversion, %^(a) 1 toluyl H Me 98 2 toluyl H Et 98 3toluyl H iPr 86 4 toluyl H tBu 93 5 toluyl H allyl 100 6 toluyl H benzyl91

The anticancer activities of ten panel analogues (3a-c,e,f and 4a-c,e,f)and digitoxin (1) were assessed using a high-throughput cytotoxicityassay on four human cancer cell lines, (FIG. 7) representing lung,colorectal, and ovarian carcinomas, as well as NCI/ADR-RES, adrug-resistant ovarian carcinoma line (For years, NCI/ADR-RES cells havebeen misidentified as drug-resistant MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells,but recently this line has been shown definitively to be adrug-resistant line derived from OVCAR-8 ovarian adenocarcinoma cells.Liscovitch, M. et al., Cancer Lett. (2007) 245, 350-352. The dataclearly show that the structure of the glycosidic linkage affects boththe potency and selectivity of neoglycosides. Digitoxin displayedstrong, non-specific cytotoxicity toward the four cell lines tested, andMeON-glycosides 3α and 4α displayed a cytotoxicity profile similar todigitoxin, in accord with previous results (Langenhan, J. M. et al., J.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2005) 102, 12305-12310.) However, EtON—,AllylON—, and BnON-glycosides (3b/4b, 3e/4e. 3f/4f, respectively) weremarkedly less potent cytotoxins than digitoxin or MeON-glycosides 3a and4a; like digitoxin, 3a, and 4a, they were also non-specific.

Most significantly, iPrON-glycosides 3c and 4c displayed enhancedselectivity relative to digitoxin and MeON-glycosides 3a and 4a.Specifically, while 3c and 4c were only modestly cytotoxic toward lung,colorectal, and ovarian carcinomas, these molecules were five to sixtimes more potent cytotoxins against NCI/ADR-RES cells (IC₅₀=110±20 nMand 120±10 nM, respectively) than any other cell line tested. This maybe the first observation cell line selectivity resulting from a simplealteration of glycosidic linkage. This outcome is particularly importantsince NCI/ADR-RES is a multi-drug resistant line that has high levels ofP-glycoprotein expression (Liscovitch, M. et al., Cancer Lett. (2007)245, 350-352.) While cardiac glycosides are generally substrates forP-glycoprotein, such tumor specificity suggests that 3c and 3d may nolonger serve as P-glycoprotein substrates. Alternatively, theiPrON-glycosides may be interacting with a unique cellular target(Tanigawara, Y. et al., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. (1992), 263, 840-845).Supporting this notion, neoglycosides have previously been shown to besignificantly less potent Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase inhibitors in HEK-239 humanembryonic kidney cells than digitoxin (Langenhan, J. M. et al., J. S.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2005), 102, 12305-12310.) Also, digitoxin itselfcan target cellular components in addition to Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase (Johnson, P.H. et al., J. Mol. Cancer. Ther. (2002) 1, 1293 1304; Komentiani, P. etal., Mol. Pharmacol. (2005) 67, 929-936) such as the TNF-α/NF-κBsignaling pathway, a regulator of inflammation responses relevant tocancer therapy (Yang, Q. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2005) 102,9631-9636.) Neoglycosides 3a-c and 4a-c were more potent cytotoxins thanthe corresponding aglycons (2a-c), confirming the importance of sugarattachments to the cytotoxicity of cardiac neoglycosides (data notshown).

Amphidmedosides are a new class of natural products recently isolated insmall quantities from marine sponges, and preliminary data suggeststhese molecules may be potent anti-cancer agents (Takekawa, Y, et al.,J. Nat. Prod. (2006) 69, 1503-1505). The present invention can be usedto synthesize the above amphimedisides as well as amphemedosidederivatives having different NOR linkages and different sugars.

The following is a retrosynthetic analysis outlining the generalstrategy for synthesizing ampimedoside B. The same general strategycould be used to synthesize a variety of amphimedosides, includingamphimedosides A-E and additional derivatives containing differentsugars and/or NOR linkages rather than the natural NOMe linkage. Many ofthe steps for synthesizing the aglycon are based on work reported inGoundry, W. R. F., et al., Tetrahedron (2003) 59, 1719-1729.

The inventor has initiated the syntheses of amphimedosides A, B, and C,and the following reaction sequences illustrate the progress that hasbeen made in these syntheses.

In summary, a mild, chemoselective reaction is presented betweenoxyamines and unprotected, unactivated reducing sugars to construct forthe first time a panel of linkage-diversified neoglycosides. Thismodestly-sized panel of digitoxin analogs included tumor-selectivecytotoxins, validating linkage diversification through neoglycosylationas a unique and simple strategy to powerfully complement existingmethods for the optimization of glycoconjugates.

Experimental details, characterization of data synthesis description ofthe new compounds, and complete cytotoxicity assay data are provided inthe following section.

I. General Procedures

Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H NMR) spectra were recorded indeuterated solvents on a 300 MHz or 400 MHz spectrometer. Chemicalshifts are reported in parts per million (ppm, δ) relative totetramethylsilane (0.00) for d-chloroform, or the residual proticsolvent peak for other solvents. ¹H NMR splitting patterns with observedfirst order coupling are designated as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet(t), or quartet (q). Splitting patterns that could not be interpreted oreasily visualized are designated as multiplet (m), broad (br), orapparent (a). Carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C NMR) spectra wererecorded on a 300 MHz or 400 MHz spectrometer. Mass spectra (MS) wereobtained using electrospray ionization. Commercially available reagentsand solvents were used without further purification. Analytical thinlayer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on TLC plates pre-coated withsilica gel 60 (250 μm layer thickness). Visualization was accomplishedusing either a UV lamp or potassium permanganate stain (2 g KMnO₄, 13.3g K₂CO₃, 2 mL 2M NaOH, 200 mL H₂O). Flash column chromatography wasperformed on 40-60 μm silica gel (230-400 mesh). Solvent mixtures usedfor TLC and flash column chromatography are reported in v/v ratios.

II. Synthesis

Digitoxigenone. Jones reagent was prepared by mixing CrO₃ (21.03 g),H₂SO₄ (18.6 mL), and water (57 μL). This reagent was slowly added to anErlenmeyer flask containing digitoxin (10.0 g, 13.1 mmol) and suspendedin acetone (650 mL) at 0° C. The resulting mixture was stirred for 3 hat rm temp. The mixture was then cooled to 0° C., quenched withapproximately 30 mL MeOH, stirred for 20 min, and 30 mL water was added.Volatile solvents were removed under reduced pressure, and the aqueousmixture was extracted with chloroform (4×70 mL). The combined organiclayers were washed with sat. aq. NaHCO₃, two times with water, driedover Na₂SO₄, filtered, then concentrated. The product ketonedigitoxigenone (3.06 g, 63% yield), obtained as a white foam (TLCR_(f)=0.23 in 3:2 EtOAc/hexane), was used without further purification.¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 5.89 (s, 1H), 5.03 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.2,1.5), 4.94 (B of ABX, 1H, J=18.2, 1.7), 2.82 (m, 1H), 2.65 (dd, 1H,J=14.5), 2.37 (td, 1H, J=14.8, 5.4), 2.17 (m, 4H), 2.04 (m, 2H),1.96-1.73 (m, 6H), 1.67 (m, 1H), 1.61-1.23 (m, 7H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 0.92(s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 212.9, 175.0, 174.7, 117.5, 85.0,77.4, 73.6, 50.8, 49.7, 43.7, 42.1, 41.4, 39.7, 37.1, 36.7, 36.5, 35.2,33.0, 26.9, 26.5, 22.5, 21.2, 20.9, 15.8; Electrospray ionization-MS m/z(M+H) calculated for C₂₃H₃₃O₄373.5, observed 373.2.

General Procedure for Generation of Aglycons (2). Digitoxigenone (9.48g, 25.5 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (2.2 mL/mmol) and pyridine (2.2eq.). Oxyamine hydrochloride (1.6 eq.) was added, and the solution wasstirred for 2.5 hours then concentrated. The resulting residue wasdissolved in CH₂Cl₂ and washed with 1 M HCl brine, dried over MgSO₄,filtered, and then concentrated. The mixture of oxime diastereomers (1eq.) was suspended in ethanol (2.9 mL/mmol) and cooled to 0° C. Boranetert-butylamine complex (3.3 eq.) was added, followed by the dropwiseaddition 10% aq. HCl (2.7 mL/mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at0° C. for 2.5 hours. After this time, Na₂CO₃ was added until gasevolution ceased, and the mixture was partitioned between water andCHCl₃. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over MgSO₄,filtered, and concentrated. The resulting diastereomeric mixture wasresolved via SiO₂ column chromatography.

Preparation of ethoxyamines 2a. See Langenhan, J. M. et al., Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. (2005) 102, 12305-12310.

Preparation of ethoxyamines 2b & 2bα. Via the general procedure,digitoxigenone (200 mg, 0.537 mmol) was converted a mixture ofethoxyamine diastereomers. The mixture was purified by SiO₂ columnchromatography eluting with 1:1 EtOAc/hexane to elute 2b (β-isomer) (TLCR_(f)=0.24 in 1:1 EtOAc/hexane) and then with 3:2 EtOAc/hexane to elute2bα (α-isomer) (TLC R_(f)=0.07 in 1:1 EtOAc/hexane).

Aglycon 2b was obtained as a foam (76.5 mg, 44% yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃,300 MHz) δ 5.87 (m, 1H), 5.01 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.1, 1.2), 4.82 (B ofABX, 1H, J=18.1, 1.7), 3.73 (q, 2H), 3.24 (br s, 1H), 2.79 (m, 1H), 2.15(m, 2H), 1.85 (m, 3H), 1.73-1.22 (m, 17H), 1.17 (t, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H),0.87 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 174.9, 174.6, 117.5, 85.5,73.5, 69.6, 55.0, 50.9, 49.6, 41.8, 40.0, 36.6, 35.6, 35.5, 33.1, 30.4,28.7, 26.9, 26.6, 25.3, 23.7, 21.2, 21.0, 15.8, 14.3; Electrosprayionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculated for C₂₅H₃₉NO₄ 418.3, observed 418.3.

Aglycon 2bα (undesired α-isomer) was obtained as a foam (69.5 mg, 40%yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 300 MHz) δ 5.87 (s, 1H), 5.00 (A of ABX, 1H,J=18.1, 1.4), 4.82 (B of ABX, 11H, J=18.1, 1.5), 3.74 (q, 2H), 2.91 (m,1H), 2.77 (m, 1H), 2.16 (m, 2H), 1.85 (m, 3H), 1.74-1.22 (m, 17H), 1.18(t, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 174.9,174.7, 117.7, 85.6, 77.4, 73.6, 70.1, 60.6, 51.1, 49.7, 42.1, 41.7,40.1, 36.4, 35.6, 35.3, 33.4, 31.3, 27.3, 27.0, 25.6, 23.6, 21.7, 21.1,15.9, 14.4.

Preparation of iso-propoxyamines 2c & 2cα. Via the general procedure,digitoxigenone (200 mg, 0.537 mmol) was converted a mixture ofiso-propoxyamine diastereomers. The mixture was purified by SiO₂ columnchromatography eluting with 2:3 EtOAc/hexane to elute 2c (β-isomer) (TLCR_(f)=0.30 in 2:3 EtOAc/hexane) and then 2cα (α-isomer) (TLC R_(f)=0.16in 2:3 EtOAc/hexane):

Aglycon 2c was obtained as a foam (62.5 mg, 32% yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃,300 MHz) δ 5.87 (m, 1H), 5.01 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.0, 1.3), 4.91 (B ofABX, 1H, J=18.0, 1.6), 3.81 (sept, 11H), 3.20 (br s, 1H), 2.77 (m, 1H),2.16 (m, 2H), 1.86 (m, 3H), 1.73-1.22 (m, 17H), 1.14 (d, 6H), 0.93 (s,3H), 0.87 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 175.0, 174.7, 117.7,85.7, 77.4, 74.8, 73.6, 55.2, 51.1, 49.8, 42.0, 40.2, 36.8, 35.8, 35.6,33.3, 30.6, 29.0, 27.0, 26.8, 23.9, 21.5, 21.3, 21.2, 15.9; Electrosprayionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculated for C₂₆H₄₁NO₄ 432.3, observed 432.4.

Aglycon 2cα (undesired α-isomer) was obtained as a foam (66.9 mg, 34%yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 300 MHz) δ 5.87 (s, 1H), 5.00 (A of ABX, 1H,J=18.1, 1.6), 4.81 (B of ABX, 1H, J=18.1, 1.7), 3.82 (sept, 1H), 2.87(m, 1H), 2.77 (m, 1H), 2.15 (m, 2H), 1.84 (m, 3H), 1.74-1.22 (m, 17H),1.15 (d, 6H), 0.93 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ174.7, 174.6, 117.6, 85.5, 77.3, 75.2, 73.5, 60.5, 50.9, 49.6, 42.0,41.6, 40.0, 36.3, 35.5, 35.3, 33.2, 31.3, 27.2, 26.9, 25.6, 23.5, 21.6,21.4, 20.9, 15.8.

Preparation of tert-butoxyamines 2d & 2dα. Via the general procedure,digitoxigenone (200 mg, 0.537 mmol) was converted a mixture oftert-butoxyamine diastereomers. The mixture was purified by SiO₂ columnchromatography eluting with 1:4 EtOAc/toluene to elute 2d (β-isomer)(TLC R_(f)=0.19 in 1:4 EtOAc/toluene) and then 2dα (α-isomer) (TLCR_(f)=0.14 in 1:4 EtOAc/toluene).

Aglycon 2d was obtained as a white solid (37.2 mg, 25% yield). ¹H NMR(CDCl₃, 300 MHz) δ 5.87 (br t, 1H), 5.00 (A of ABX, 1H, J=17.9, 1.3),4.81 (B of ABX, 1H, J=17.9, 1.7), 3.12 (br s, 1H), 2.78 (m, 1H), 2.16(m, 2H), 1.86 (m, 3H), (m, 17H), 1.18 (s, 9H), 0.93 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s,3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 174.8, 174.7, 117.8, 85.8, 76.5, 73.6,55.2, 51.1, 49.8, 42.1, 40.2, 36.9, 35.8, 35.6, 33.4, 30.8, 29.0, 27.2,27.1, 26.8, 24.0, 23.1, 21.4, 21.3, 15.9; Electrospray ionization-MS m/z(M+H) calculated for C₂₇H₄₃NO₄ 446.3, observed 446.4.

Aglycon 2dα(undesired α-isomer) was obtained as a white solid (83.8 mg,57% yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 300 MHz) δ 5.87 (s, 1H), 5.00 (A of ABX, 1H,J=18.0, 1.3), 4.81 (B of ABX, 1H, J=18.0, 1.4), 4.71 (br s 1H), 2.77 (m,2H), 2.15 (m, 2H), (m, 20H), 1.17 (s, 9H), 0.93 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H);¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 174.9, 174.7, 117.7, 85.6, 77.4, 76.4, 73.6,60.5, 51.1, 49.7, 42.1, 41.9, 40.1, 36.4, 35.6, 35.5, 31.7, 31.7, 27.3,27.1, 26.0, 23.7, 21.7, 21.1, 15.9.

Preparation of allyloxyamines 2e & 2eα. Via the general procedure,digitoxigenone (200 mg, 0.537 mmol) was converted a mixture ofallyloxyamine diastereomers. The mixture was purified by SiO₂ columnchromatography eluting with 2:3 EtOAc/toluene to elute 2e (β-isomer)(TLC R_(f)=0.24 in 2:3 EtOAc/hexane) and then 2eα (α-isomer) (TLCR_(f)=0.08 in 2:3 EtOAc/hexane).

Aglycon 2e was obtained as a white solid (70.2 mg, 41% yield). ¹H NMR(CDCl₃, 300 MHz) δ 5.94 (ddt, 1H, J=17.4, 10.3, 6.0), 5.87 (br t, 1H),5.44 (br s, 1H), 5.27 (ddt, 1H, J=17.3, 3.3, 1.6), 5.18 (ddt, 1H,J=10.4, 1.9, 1.0), 5.01 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.2, 1.4), 4.82 (B of ABX, 1H,J=18.2, 1.7), 4.19 (dt, 2H, J=5.9, 1.3), 3.27 (br s, 1H), 2.79 (m, 1H),2.16 (m, 2H), 1.86 (m, 3H), 1.73-1.22 (m, 17H), 0.93 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s,3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 175.0, 174.7, 134.7, 117.8, 117.6,85.6, 75.6, 73.6, 55.2, 51.1, 49.8, 41.9, 40.1, 36.7, 35.8, 35.6, 33.3,30.5, 28.8, 27.0, 26.7, 23.9, 22.9, 21.3, 21.2, 15.9; Electrosprayionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculated for C₂₆H₃₉NO₄ 430.3, observed 430.3.

Aglycon 2eα(undesired α-isomer) was obtained as a white solid (64.0 mg,36% yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 300 MHz) δ 5.94 (ddt, 1H, J=17.3, 10.5, 5.9),5.87 (br t, 1H), 5.45 (br s, 1H), 5.28 (ddt, 1H, J=17.3, 3.3, 1.5), 5.20(ddt, 1H, J=10.4, 2.3, 1.2), 5.00 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.2, 1.3), 4.81 (Bof ABX, 1H, J=18.2, 1.7), 4.21 (dt, 2H, J=5.8, 1.3), 2.93 (m, 1H), 2.77(m, 1H), 2.15 (m, 2H), 1.86 (m, 3H), 1.76-1.22 (m, 17H), 0.93 (s, 3H),0.87 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 174.9, 174.7, 134.5, 117.7,117.6, 85.6, 75.8, 73.6, 60.6, 51.0, 49.7, 42.1, 41.7, 40.1, 36.4, 35.6,35.3, 31.3, 27.2, 26.0, 25.6, 23.6, 21.7, 21.1, 15.9.

Preparation of benzyloxyamines 2f & 2fα. Via general procedures,digitoxigenone (200 mg, 0.537 mmol) was converted a mixture ofbenzyloxyamine diastereomers. The mixture was purified by SiO₂ columnchromatography eluting with 2:3 EtOAc/toluene to elute 2f (β-isomer)(TLC R_(f)=0.24 in 2:3 EtOAc/hexane) and then 2fα (α-isomer) (TLCR_(f)=0.13 in 2:3 EtOAc/hexane).

Aglycon 2f was obtained as a foam (77.5 mg, 37% yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃,400 MHz) δ 7.31 (m, 5H), 5.86 (s, 1H), 5.43 (br s, 1H), 5.00 (A of ABX,1H, J=18.1, 1.4), 4.81 (B of ABX, 1H, J=18.1, 1.8), 4.70 (s, 2H), 3.29(s, 1H), 2.77 (m, 1H), 2.15 (m, 2H), 1.85 (m, 3H), 1.74-1.22 (m, 17H),0.94 (s, 3H), 0.86 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 175.0, 174.7,138.2, 128.6, 128.4, 127.9, 117.7, 85.6, 73.6, 55.1, 51.1, 49.8, 41.9,40.1, 36.7, 35.8, 35.6, 33.3, 30.5, 28.8, 27.0, 26.7, 23.9, 23.0, 21.3,21.2, 15.9; Electrospray ionization-MS m/z (M+H) calculated forC₃₀H₄₁NO₄ 480.3, observed 404.4.

Aglycon 2fα (undesired α-isomer) was obtained as a white powder (73.1mg, 35% yield). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 7.32 (m, 5H), 5.87 (br t, 1H),5.48 (br s, 1H), 4.99 (A of ABX, 1H, J=18.1, 1.4), 4.81 (B of ABX, 1H,J=18.1, 1.8), 4.73 (s, 2H), 2.96 (m, 1H), 2.77 (m, 1H), 2.15 (m, 2H),1.84 (m, 3H), 1.86-1.00 (m, 17H), 0.93 (s, 3H), 0.86 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR(CDCl₃, 100 MHz): δ 174.8, 174.7, 138.0, 128.5, 128.4, 128.0, 117.7,85.6, 77.1, 73.6, 60.6, 51.1, 49.7, 42.1, 41.7, 40.1, 36.4, 35.6, 35.4,33.4, 31.2, 27.3, 27.0, 25.6, 23.6, 21.7, 21.1, 15.9.

Neoglycosides. Aglycons 2b-2f (1 eq., approximately 30 μmol) eitherL-ribose or L-xylose (1.1 eq., approximately 33 μmol) added to glassvials equipped with stirring fleas and were dissolved in 9:1 MeOH/CHCl₃(final concentration of aglycon=100 mmol). AcOH was added (1 eq.,approximately 2 μL) and the reaction mixtures were stirred at 40° C. for4 days. The crude reaction mixtures were concentrated, then suspended in2% MeOH in CHCl₃. The crude suspensions were purified in parallel ondisposable SiO₂ solid-phase extraction columns using a 24-port vacuummanifold. Three treatments with 2 mL of 3% MeOH/CH₂Cl₂ eluted unreactedaglycon and five treatments with 2 mL of 5% MeOH/CH₂Cl₂ eluted products3 and 4.

Aglycon 2a was reacted with L-ribose and L-xylose using previouslyreported methodology (Langenhan, J. M. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.(2005) 102, 12305-12310.) The product solutions were concentrated,weighed, and dissolved in DMSO to make 30 mM stock solutions. The stocksolutions were characterized by LCMS using reverse phase HPLC on aZorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 column (4.6×150 mm; Agilent Technologies) with aflow rate of 0.8 mL/min and a linear gradient of 45% CH₃OH/H₂O to 85%CH₃OH/H₂O over 20 min and electrospray ionization. Percent purity wasestimated by dividing the sum of the peak areas at 220 nm of peakscorresponding to the desired product mass by the total area of all peaksbetween 5 and 22 min. Reported masses are [M+H]. A summary ofneoglycoside yields, mass data, purities, and isomer ratios is shownbelow in Table 6.

TABLE 6 LCMS information for neoglycoside panel Isolated CalculatedObserved Percent Neoglycoside Yield Mass Mass Purity Isomer ratio 3a 78536.7 536.6 98 — 3b 61 550.7 550.5 98 ~34:34:1 (overlap) 3c 8 564.7564.4 96 44:1 3d 0 — — — — 3e 7 562.7 562.5 64 52:1 3f 19 — — — — 4a 53536.7 536.6 99 100:0  4b 52 550.7 550.5 98 46:1 4c 17 564.7 564.4 9668:1:1 4d 0 — — — — 4e 12 562.7 562.5 65 10:1 4f 40 612.8 612.4 9548:3:1:1

II. Cytotoxicity Assays

All cell lines were maintained as previously reported (Langenhan, J. M.et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2005) 102, 12305-12310.) Cells wereharvested by trypsinization using 0.25% trypsin and 0.1% EDTA and thencounted in a Cellometer Auto T4 cell counter (Nexcelom, inc), beforedilution for assay plating. Cell plating, compound handling and assayset up were performed as previously reported¹ except for the cells wereplated in 50 μL volumes in 384 well clear bottom, tissue culture plates(Corning-Costar, Inc). Compounds were added from the 384-well compoundstock plates at a 1:100 dilution using a Biomek FX liquid handlerequipped with a 384 channel head (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Cell titer-gloreagent (15 μL) (Promega Corporation, Inc.) was added and incubated for10 min at room temperature with gentle agitation to lyse the cells. Eachplate was read for luminescence. The IC₅₀ value for each compoundrepresents at least four replicates of dose-response experimentsconducted over six concentrations at two-fold dilutions. Within eachexperiment, percent inhibition values at each concentration wereexpressed as a percentage of the maximum luminescence signal observedfor a 0 nM control. IC₅₀ values were determined using XLFit 4.0 aspreviously reported (see Table 7).

TABLE 7 IC₅₀s (μM) and standard errors for neoglycoside cytotoxicityagainst four cell lines. Compound 3a 4a 3b 4b 3c 4c 3e 4e 3f 4f 1 CellLine SKOV-3 IC50 >1 >1 0.12 0.20 0.73 0.68 0.71 0.61 0.92 >1 >1 SE 0.010.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 NCI- IC50 ? 0.055 0.16 0.18 0.67 0.63 0.710.63 0.69 0.76 — H460 SE 0.006 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05NCI/ADR- IC50 0.045 0.072 0.14 0.19 0.11 0.12 0.42 0.46 1.0 1.0 0.069RES SE 0.005 0.006 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.04 0.1 0.1 0.006 HT-29IC50 0.08 0.066 0.20 0.22 0.85 0.84 0.95 0.91 1.7 2.0 — SE 0.01 0.0040.02 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.2 0.2

While the present invention has been described in what is perceived tobe the most practical and preferred embodiments and examples, it is tobe understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to thespecific embodiments set forth above. Further, it is recognized thatmodifications may be made by one of skill in the art of the inventionwithout departing from the spirit or intent of the invention and,therefore, the invention is to be taken as including all reasonableequivalents to the subject matter of the appended claims. All referencescited herein are incorporated by reference for all purposes.

1. A neoglycoside having the structure:

wherein: R is —CH₃, —CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)₂, allyl, benzyl, —CH₂CH₂CH₃,—CH(CH₃)CH₂CH₃, cyclopentyl or cyclohexyl; and the sugar is L-ribose orL-xylose.
 2. A composition comprising the neoglycoside of claim 1,pharmaceutically acceptable ester, salt or prodrug thereof combined witha pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
 3. A neoglycoside having thestructure:

wherein: R₁, R₂, R₃, and R₄ of the sugar are independently selected from—H, —OH, —N₃, —NH₂, —CH₃, —CH₂OH, —CN₃, —CH₂NH, —CH₂SH, —CNH₂, —CH₂N₃,—COOH, —COCH₃, —CXH₂, or —CX₂H, where X is Cl, Br, F, or I; R₅ is —CH₃,—CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)₂, allyl, benzyl, —CH₂CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)CH₂CH₃, —C(CH₃)₃,cyclopentyl or cyclohexyl; and the aglycon is a digitoxin analog, anon-digoxigenin steroid, an indolocarbazole, an anthracyline, amacrolide, a peptide or an alkaloid.
 4. The neoglocoside of claim 3wherein the aglycon is a 3-alkylpyridine alkaloid.
 5. A method forproviding a neoglycoside comprising reacting: (i) an aglycon selectedfrom a digitoxin analog, a non-digoxigenen steroid, an indolocarbazole,an anthracyline, a macrolide, a peptide, or an alkaloid, wherein saidaglycon bears a secondary oxyamine; and (ii) a reducing sugar selectedfrom a L-sugar, a D-sugar, a deoxy-sugar, a dideoxy-sugar, a glucoseepimer, a substituted sugar, a uronic acid, or an oligosaccharide tothereby provide a neoglycoside.
 6. The method of claim 5 wherein theaglycon is a 3-alkylpyridine alkaloid.
 7. The method of claim 6 whereinthe neoglycoside provided is amphomedoside A, amphomedoside B,amphomedoside C, amphomedoside D or amphomedoside E.
 8. The method ofclaim 5 wherein the reducing sugar is selected from the group consistingof L-ribose, D-ribose, L-fucose, D-fucose, 2-deoxy-D-galactose,3-deoxy-D-glucose, 6-deoxy-D-glucose, 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose,6-deoxy-6-fluoro-D-glucose, L-xylose, D-xylose, L-rhamnose, L-allose,D-allose, L-altrose, D-altrose, L-galactose, D-galactose, L-xylose,D-xylose, D-gulose, L-mannose, D-mannose, L-idose, D-idose, L-mycarose,6-keto-D-galactose, L-arabinose, D-arabinose,N-acetyl-D-galactosaminose, melibiose, lactose, maltose,D-galacturonose, L-talose, D-talose, 6-deoxy-6-azo-D-mannose, L-glucose,D-glucose, O-D-glucose, R—C(3)aglycon, S—C(3) aglycon and mixturesthereof.
 9. The method of claim 5 wherein the aglycon has the structure:

wherein R is —CH₃, —CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)₂, allyl, benzyl, —CH₂CH₂CH₃,—CH(CH₃)CH₂CH₃, cyclopentyl or cyclohexyl.
 10. A neoglycoside providedby the method of claim
 5. 11. A neoglycoside library comprising at leasttwo different neoglysides according to claim
 3. 12. A method of treatinga subject having cancer cells comprising the step of contacting thecancer cells with an effective amount of the neoglyoside of claim 1 orpharmaceutically acceptable ester, salt or prodrug thereof.
 13. Themethod of claim 12 wherein said cancer cells are ovarian cancer cells.14. The method of claim 12 wherein said cancer cells are lung cancercells.
 15. The method of claim 12 wherein said cancer cells arecolorectal cancer cells.
 16. A method of making a neoglycoside librarycomprising the steps of: providing a plurality of reducing sugarsselected from the group consisting of a L-sugar, a D-sugar, adeoxy-sugar, a dideoxy-sugar, a glucose epimer, a substituted sugar, auronic acid, an oligosaccharide and mixtures thereof; and contacting thereducing sugars with at least one aglycon having a secondary oxyamine toform a plurality of neoglycosides.
 17. The method of claim 16 whereinthe aglycon is selected from the group consisting of a digitoxin analog,a non-digoxigenin steroid, an indolocarbazole, an anthracyline, amacrolide, a peptide or an alkaloid.
 18. The method of claim 17 whereinthe aglycon is a 3-alkylpyridine alkaloid.
 19. The method of claim 16wherein the reducing sugar is of the formula:

where R₁, R₂, R₃, and R₄ are independently selected from —H, —OH, —N₃,—NH₂, —CH₃, —CH₂OH, —CN₃, —CH₂NH, —CH₂SH, —CNH₂, —CH₂N₃, —COOH, —COCH₃,—CXH₂, —CX₂H, and where X is Cl, Br, F, or I.
 20. The method of claim 16wherein the aglycon is:

wherein R is —CH₃, —CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)₂, —C(CH₃)₃, allyl, benzyl,—CH₂CH₂CH₃, —CH(CH₃)CH₂CH₃, cyclopentyl or cyclohexyl.